Prohibit Counter Mechanism for In-Device Coexistence Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In-device coexistence (IDC) interference occurs between different wireless interfaces in user equipment (UE) operating in adjacent or overlapping radio frequency bands, such as LTE, ISM, and GNSS, leading to signal interference and sub-optimal data communication performance, especially with dynamically fluctuating traffic.

Innovation Solution

A prohibit counter mechanism is introduced to control the frequency of IDC indications, allowing timely reporting of interference while reducing signaling overhead, by setting a maximum count value for transmissions and using a prohibit timer to manage when IDC indications are sent, thereby optimizing IDC interference handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If IDC indications are transmitted frequently to report interference timely, then interference reporting responsiveness is improved, but signaling overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference reporting responsivenessVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a prohibit counter mechanism that periodically restricts IDC indication transmissions. The counter increments with each IDC indication sent and compares against a threshold value, creating periodic transmission windows separated by prohibited periods. This periodic action reduces signaling overhead while maintaining timely interference reporting during critical periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the prohibit counter threshold based on interference conditions and traffic patterns. When interference is detected, the system can modify the threshold value to allow more frequent indications, and when interference subsides, it increases the restriction. This dynamic adjustment optimizes the balance between reporting responsiveness and signaling overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Loss of information

If multiple UEs transmit IDC indications simultaneously, then interference reporting completeness is improved, but unfairness among UEs increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference reporting completenessVSAvoidfairness among UEs
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring prohibit counters and threshold values for each UE before interference events occur. This pre-configuration establishes a fair baseline for all UEs, preventing simultaneous transmissions and ensuring orderly access to the network for interference reporting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the network monitors IDC indication patterns from multiple UEs and adjusts individual prohibit counter thresholds based on observed behavior. This feedback loop ensures that UEs with excessive transmission patterns receive stricter control, maintaining fairness while preserving overall interference reporting completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8849293B2Handling in-device coexistence interference
Publication Date: 2014.09.30 MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LTD
  • US8849293B2 patent drawing
  • US8849293B2 patent drawing
  • US8849293B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A user equipment is able to transmit, to a wireless access node, an indication of in-device coexistence (IDC) interference between the wireless interfaces. The user equipment can include a counter to track a number of transmissions having the indication of IDC interference.