Project Plan Collaboration System with Proposal-Based Change Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing project management systems lack effective collaboration tools for team members to modify project plans, leading to inefficiencies in task assignment and timeline management, as they often require manual merging of changes and lack a mechanism for analyzing the impact of proposed changes on the overall project plan.

Innovation Solution

A system that enables team members to submit proposals for modifying a shared project plan, allowing a project manager to perform a 'what-if' analysis on proposed changes, ensuring that changes are approved before being implemented, and maintaining a central copy for approval and rejection processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If team members can submit proposals to modify the project plan, then collaboration and adaptability are improved, but the complexity of the system increases due to approval workflows and change tracking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaboration capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The project plan is divided into sections that can be independently modified by different team members. Each section can have its own proposal workflow, allowing localized changes without affecting the entire plan. This segmentation enables collaborative editing while managing complexity through modular change management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system requires team members to submit proposals for modifications before changes are implemented. This preliminary action of proposing changes allows the system to track and manage modifications systematically, ensuring that all changes are reviewed and approved before affecting the project plan, thus reducing unintended complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If a project manager performs what-if analysis on proposed changes, then decision-making accuracy is improved, but the time required for analysis and approval increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs what-if analysis in advance before finalizing changes to the project plan. By simulating the impact of proposed changes beforehand, the project manager can make more accurate decisions about whether to approve modifications, reducing the need for time-consuming trial-and-error adjustments later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to the project manager about the potential impact of proposed changes through what-if analysis. This feedback mechanism allows the manager to quickly assess whether a change is beneficial before implementing it, reducing the overall time required for decision-making by avoiding unnecessary approvals and reversals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If changes are approved before implementation, then project plan reliability is improved, but the speed of implementing changes decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplan stabilityVSAvoidchange implementation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs approval actions before changes are implemented, ensuring that all modifications to the project plan have been reviewed and validated in advance. This preliminary approval process maintains the reliability and stability of the plan by preventing unauthorized or harmful changes from being implemented.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically tracks and manages change proposals, reducing the manual overhead of approval processes. Automated tracking of proposed changes, their status, and their impact allows for faster processing of approvals while maintaining reliability, as the system handles the bureaucracy efficiently without requiring extensive manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9129256B2Enabling collaboration on a project plan
Publication Date: 2015.09.08 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US9129256B2 patent drawing
  • US9129256B2 patent drawing
  • US9129256B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and software applications for enabling the collaboration on a project plan are described in the present disclosure. A computer readable medium is configured to store instructions that are executable by a processing device. According to one embodiment, among many, the computer readable medium includes logic adapted to enable a member of a project team to submit a proposal for modifying a current project plan to a project manager. The computer readable medium also includes logic adapted to enable the project manager to accept or reject the proposal for modifying the current project plan. Various team members make changes to a single shared copy of the project plan. The changes can be to a respective team member's section of the plan