Project Plan Optimization via Visual Dependency Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current project management software often results in errors and inefficiencies when creating and managing project plans, particularly due to complex task dependencies, resource allocation, and timeline management, leading to costly derailments and difficulties in maintaining accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for preparing and optimizing project plans that dynamically calculates task start and end dates, displays dependencies visually, and uses AI to suggest tasks, while minimizing errors through a user-friendly interface that allows for intuitive editing and resource management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional project management software is used to create and manage project plans, then basic scheduling functions are provided, but errors and inefficiencies occur due to complex task dependencies, resource allocation, and timeline management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject plan accuracyVSAvoidtask dependency management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the project plan into discrete task graphics displayed on a timeline, where each task is an independent visual element. This segmentation allows complex dependencies to be broken down into manageable individual tasks that can be independently managed and visually tracked, reducing the complexity of managing overall project relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computing device that acts as a mediator between the user and the project plan data. This device automatically calculates task dates, manages dependencies, and provides visual feedback, eliminating the need for manual tracking and reducing errors while maintaining simplicity for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If manual calculation of task dates is performed, then flexibility in planning is maintained, but errors in timeline and cost calculations occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask date calculation accuracyVSAvoidtime required for plan preparation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automation where the computing device automatically calculates task start and end dates based on input parameters and dependencies. This eliminates manual calculation efforts while ensuring precision through automated algorithms, and significantly reduces the time required to prepare and update project plans.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors task dependencies and automatically adjusts calculations when changes are made. This real-time feedback ensures accuracy is maintained without requiring manual verification, and the automated updates prevent propagation of errors through the project plan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If detailed task dependencies are tracked, then project plan accuracy is improved, but the complexity of managing and visualizing dependencies increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedependency tracking accuracyVSAvoiddependency visualization ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions dependency tracking from a traditional linear or tabular format to a visual timeline dimension. Task graphics are positioned along a temporal axis, with dependencies represented through visual connections and positioning. This dimensional change makes complex dependencies intuitively understandable while maintaining accurate tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses color changes and visual indicators to represent different dependency states and task attributes. This visual encoding allows users to quickly grasp complex dependency relationships without requiring detailed analysis, improving ease of operation while maintaining comprehensive tracking accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

4Reliability

If resource allocation is manually managed, then flexibility in resource assignment is maintained, but errors in resource conflicts and cost overruns occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation accuracyVSAvoidresource management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated resource allocation where the computing device independently manages resource assignment based on task requirements and availability. This self-service approach detects conflicts automatically and provides recommendations or automatic resolutions, ensuring accurate resource allocation without requiring complex manual coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual resource management mechanics with automated computational systems. The computing device uses algorithms to optimize resource assignment, detect conflicts, and calculate costs, substituting human judgment and manual processes with precise automated systems that reduce errors while maintaining necessary flexibility through configurable parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20230351282A1Systems and methods for preparing and optimizing a project plan
Publication Date: 2023.11.02 OVERVUE PLANNING SYST INC
  • US20230351282A1 patent drawing
  • US20230351282A1 patent drawing
  • US20230351282A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for preparing and optimizing a project plan is described. The system includes various modules including a database, a user interface, a cost analyzer, a resource conflict analyzer, a critical path analyzer, a calendar calculator, and a plan editor. The various analyzers and plan editor perform automatic calculations and analyses when preparing a project plan to optimize the project plan in terms of start and end dates, resource use and costs, and to reduce or eliminate errors in the project plan in terms of time conflicts and incorrect task dependencies.