Project Planning System Data Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current project planning systems are inefficient due to the overwhelming amount of information and numerous options available, leading to cost overruns, time delays, and misunderstandings, as users lack organized and reliable data to effectively plan and implement projects.

Innovation Solution

A project planning system that provides a step-by-step process, including a Vision Album, Planning Guide, and Project Journal, facilitating interactive collaboration between users and stakeholders to aggregate and organize data, creating a comprehensive Project Portfolio that outlines project parameters, guidelines, product selections, and implementation actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If comprehensive information and numerous options are provided to users, then the completeness of project planning data is improved, but the complexity of information management and user decision-making increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of project planning dataVSAvoidcomplexity of information management
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments project planning information into distinct categories and phases (e.g., project initiation, planning, execution, monitoring). Each category contains specific types of information, allowing users to navigate and manage data in organized sections rather than overwhelming comprehensive lists.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary between multiple information sources and users, aggregating data from various sources (OEMs, trade contractors, suppliers) and presenting it through a unified interface. This mediator function organizes and filters information before delivery to users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If comprehensive information and numerous options are provided to users, then the completeness of project planning data is improved, but the time required for selection and management increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of project planning dataVSAvoidtime required for selection and management
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-aggregating and organizing information from multiple sources before users need it. Data is collected, validated, and structured in advance, so users receive ready-to-use organized information rather than raw data requiring manual processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where user selections and project requirements are continuously processed to refine and customize information delivery. The system learns from user interactions to provide more targeted recommendations and filter options automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If expert guidance is used to limit selections, then the ease of decision-making is improved, but the cost and subjectivity of expert opinions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of decision-makingVSAvoidcost of expert guidance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by providing users with automated tools to navigate options and make selections independently. Intelligent algorithms guide users through decision-making processes based on their project requirements, eliminating the need for expensive external expert consultation while maintaining ease of use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If fragmented sources and incomplete information are used, then the simplicity of information access is improved, but the reliability and completeness of project planning data deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of information accessVSAvoidreliability of project planning data
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple fragmented information sources into a unified comprehensive platform. Data from OEMs, trade contractors, suppliers, and other sources is integrated and cross-referenced, providing users with complete and reliable information through a single access point rather than requiring navigation of multiple separate sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20240037470A1Project planning system
Publication Date: 2024.02.01 GREENGO SYST
  • US20240037470A1 patent drawing
  • US20240037470A1 patent drawing
  • US20240037470A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An interactive and collaborative, planning, designing and facilitating tool that connects users with organized information and relevant data, providers and facilitators to resolve technical issues in conceptualizing, designing and implementing a custom project.