Projectile Arming Device Friction Elimination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional micro-machined safety and arming devices for pyrotechnic chains in projectiles face challenges due to their complex structure and size limitations, particularly in medium-caliber ammunition, where the centrifugal flyweight generates friction that disturbs the movement and delays arming, making them unsuitable for compact applications.

Innovation Solution

A micro-machined safety and arming device with an axial rotational movement mechanism, featuring a pyrotechnic chain interrupter shutter immobilized by two locks: a breakable axial acceleration lock and a centrifugal lock with tilting locking fingers, where the flyweight contacts an extension to release the lock, ensuring smooth movement without frictional interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional micro-machined safety and arming device uses a centrifugal flyweight to maintain a lock engaged in a shutter indentation, then the device can ensure safety during storage and firing, but the friction generated by maintaining the lock disturbs the movement of the flyweight and delays the centrifugal arming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety during storage and firingVSAvoidcentrifugal arming delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is segmented into two independent locks: a first lock (axial acceleration lock) that breaks under firing acceleration to release the shutter, and a second lock (centrifugal lock) that releases only under centrifugal force during rotation. This segmentation allows each lock to be optimized for its specific function, with the centrifugal lock using tilting fingers that engage only when needed, minimizing friction during storage while ensuring reliable release during arming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second lock uses dynamic tilting fingers that can pivot between engaged and disengaged positions. The fingers are held in a neutral position during storage but tilt to engage the shutter indentation when centrifugal force is applied, and return to neutral when the force is removed. This dynamic behavior eliminates continuous friction while maintaining safety during rotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the second lock uses a flyweight to maintain engagement throughout the stroke, then safety is ensured, but friction disturbs the flyweight movement and affects centrifugal arming delay

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety during rotationVSAvoidflyweight movement speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The tilting fingers transition from a static engaged position to a dynamic position that engages only when centrifugal force is applied. During storage, the fingers remain in a neutral position without contacting the shutter, eliminating friction. During rotation, the fingers tilt to engage the shutter indentation, providing safety only when needed, and return to neutral when the rotation stops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The tilting fingers act as intermediaries between the flyweight and the shutter. Instead of the flyweight directly maintaining engagement throughout the stroke, the fingers transmit the centrifugal force from the flyweight to the shutter only when engaged, allowing the flyweight to move freely during storage without frictional interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device ensures reliable arming without frictional disturbances, is compact, and suitable for medium-caliber projectiles, providing a sufficient arming delay and improved reliability by eliminating the need for return springs and complex locking mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

a flyweight arranged in a housing of the shutter and sliding under the effect of the centrifugal acceleration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal acceleration: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

A first lock (or axial acceleration lock) which is released following the application of the acceleration imparted to the projectile during firing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAxial inertial force: Inertia

Data Source

PatentEP2482027B1Arming and security device for a pyrotechnic chain of a projectile
Publication Date: 2013.08.28 NEXTER MUNITIONS SA
  • EP2482027B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2482027B1 patent drawingFigure 2a~2b
  • EP2482027B1 patent drawingFigure 2c~4

AI summary

The invention relates to a micro-machined or micro-engraved safety and arming device (12) for a pyrotechnic chain of a projectile that is animated by an axial rotational movement during firing. This device comprises a pyrotechnic chain interruption flap (14) held immobilized by at least two latches: a first latch (17) that is released following the application of the firing acceleration, and a second latch (18) that is a centrifugal latch. This device is characterized in that the second latch comprises at least one pivoting locking finger (18a) against which the flap (14) is pressed in the locked position. The finger has an extension (18d) against which, at the end of its travel, a weight (21) disposed in a recess of the flap (14) makes contact. The flap slides under the effect of the centrifugal acceleration.