Projectile Brake Arrangement with Expanded Surface Area

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional brake systems for projectiles, such as brake washers, have limited braking ability and require complex mechanical designs or space in the detonator, making them inefficient for achieving short firing ranges.

Innovation Solution

A brake system with a larger braking surface area than the conventional πR2-πr2, configured as a truncated cone, truncated cone with bottom, truncated oblate ellipsoid of revolution, washer with edge, or washer with middle segment, featuring a through hole, to increase air resistance and braking effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional brake washer with surface area πR2-πr2 is used, then the braking arrangement is simple and requires no additional space in the detonator, but the braking ability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking abilityVSAvoidbrake configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The brake transitions from a flat two-dimensional washer to a three-dimensional structure with enhanced surface area through conical sides, bottom surfaces, and middle segments that protrude axially, utilizing the third dimension to increase braking effectiveness without adding radial complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The brake is divided into distinct functional segments including front braking surfaces, middle segments with through holes, and rear braking surfaces, allowing each segment to contribute independently to the overall braking effect while maintaining structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Area of stationary object

If a mechanically deployable brake with four braking plates is used, then the braking surface is increased and encircles the projectile, but the mechanical complexity increases and space in the detonator is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking surface areaVSAvoidmechanical deployment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The brake is pre-configured in its final braking position between the detonator and projectile body before firing, eliminating the need for mechanical deployment mechanisms during flight while maintaining the required braking surface area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The brake integrates multiple functional elements including braking surfaces, through holes for gas passage, and structural support into a single unified component that performs all necessary functions simultaneously without requiring separate mechanical systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If the brake surface area is increased beyond πR2-πr2, then the air resistance and braking effectiveness are improved, but the brake requires more space and complex configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking effectivenessVSAvoidbrake volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The brake concentrates its volume in specific regions where it is most effective - between the detonator and projectile body - with conical sides and middle segments positioned to maximize air resistance without uniformly increasing volume throughout the entire structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The brake incorporates through holes that create a porous structure, allowing propellant gases to pass through while the surrounding material provides braking surface area, effectively increasing braking effectiveness without proportionally increasing solid volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The enhanced brake configurations provide improved braking performance by increasing the surface area, allowing for shorter firing ranges without the need for complex mechanical designs or additional space in the detonator, and can be fabricated using various materials and manufacturing techniques.

Implementation Method 1

the brake is configured with a braking surface which is situated in the direction of travel of the projectile... to increase air resistance and braking effectiveness

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir resistance: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS11953298B2Brake arrangement for a projectile
Publication Date: 2024.04.09 BAE SYSTEM BOFORS AB
  • US11953298B2 patent drawing
  • US11953298B2 patent drawing
  • US11953298B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a brake for detachable arrangement on projectiles, the brake is configured with a surface which is situated in the direction of travel of the projectile, where the surface is larger than a surface given by πR2-πr2, where R is the outer radius of the brake and r is the inner radius of the brake. A method for braking projectiles is also provided.