Projectile Core Liner Deformation Reduces Ricochet

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional projectiles face challenges in achieving superior penetration and fragmentation, especially at non-normal angles of approach, and often use toxic or environmentally harmful materials.

Innovation Solution

A projectile design featuring a liner with an interior void and a core positioned at the trailing end, where the core travels through the liner's leading end to impact the target, creating deformation and reducing ricochet risk, and the liner fragments to enhance lethality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a dense metal core is used to increase momentum and penetration capability, then penetration capability is improved, but the projectile may ricochet off the target as the angle of approach increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepenetration capabilityVSAvoidricochet probability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The projectile is segmented into a dense metal core and a surrounding liner structure. The core provides penetration capability while the liner fragments to reduce ricochet probability, dividing the functions between separate components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The projectile uses composite materials combining a dense metal core (for penetration) with a liner material (for fragmentation and ricochet reduction). This composite structure allows both penetration capability and reduced ricochet probability to be achieved simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-generated harmful factors

If a secondary explosive charge is used to cause fragmentation on impact, then fragmentation capability is improved, but penetration capability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefragmentation capabilityVSAvoidpenetration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The projectile separates fragmentation function (performed by the liner) from penetration function (performed by the dense metal core). The liner is designed to fragment outwardly while the core maintains penetration capability, eliminating the trade-off present in explosive-charge-based designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If commonly used metals such as lead or spent uranium-238 are used, then penetration capability is improved, but long term toxic and environmentally harmful effects occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepenetration capabilityVSAvoidtoxic and environmental harm
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The material composition parameter is changed from toxic metals (lead, uranium-238) to non-toxic alternatives that can still achieve required penetration capability when combined with the dense metal core and liner configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The projectile uses composite materials where a small dense metal core provides penetration while the majority of the structure uses non-toxic materials, reducing overall toxicity while maintaining penetration performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances penetration and fragmentation capabilities while minimizing ricochet and environmental impact by using a core that travels through the liner to impact the target, ensuring effective penetration and controlled fragmentation.

Implementation Method 1

the core travels in a direction of flight through the leading end portion of the liner to impact the object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Implementation Method 2

the core travels through the leading end portion of the liner to impact the target

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact Force: Impact Force

Implementation Method 3

the liner may be configured to fragment outwardly from the core as the core travels through the leading end portion of the liner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStress concentration:

Implementation Method 4

the liner may be configured to fragment outwardly from the core

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFracture mechanics: Fracture Mechanics

Data Source

PatentUS10082376B1Penetrating and fragmenting projectile
Publication Date: 2018.09.25 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
  • US10082376B1 patent drawing
  • US10082376B1 patent drawing
  • US10082376B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A projectile has a liner forming an interior void, and a core disposed in a first region of the void proximal to a trailing end portion of the liner, with a portion of the void disposed forward with respect to the core. An outer jacket covers a leading end portion of the liner to enclose the interior void. When the projectile impacts a target object, the core travels in a direction of flight through the leading end portion of the liner to impact the object. When the projectile impacts a target surface at a non-zero angle of approach with respect to the normal of the target surface, the projectile creates a deformation in the target surface immediately before the core travels through the leading end portion of the liner to impact the target. This deformation reduces the probability that the core will ricochet off the deformed portion of the surface.