Automated Projectile Loader for Two-Piece Ammunition at Any Turret Angle

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing armored vehicle projectile loaders face challenges in automating the loading of two-piece projectiles due to space constraints and the need for independent loading of projectiles and propellants at various turret angles, while also requiring significant space and weight penalties.

Innovation Solution

An automated projectile loader system for vehicles that includes a carousal and bustle storage unit, an automated arm, and a controlling unit, capable of loading projectiles and propellants from either storage orientation, and aligning them with the turret barrel at any elevation angle, using robotic arms and motorized mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual loading operation is performed by operator in turret, then high head room is required for effective handling, but this leads to increased turret size and weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator handling capabilityVSAvoidturret weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The operator is extracted from the turret loading function and relocated to the hull. The turret now contains only the automated loading mechanism, eliminating the need for operator head room and reducing turret weight while maintaining effective projectile handling capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical handling system operated by the operator is replaced with an automated mechanical loading system comprising robotic arms, grippers, and control mechanisms that perform projectile loading without human intervention in the turret

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Volume of stationary object

If single storage system is used for projectiles, then space is saved, but the number of rounds is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage spaceVSAvoidnumber of rounds
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Two separate storage systems (carousal storage in the hull and bustle storage in the turret) are merged into a unified ammunition supply system. The automated arm can draw projectiles from either storage location, effectively combining their capacities to increase the total number of rounds while optimizing space utilization in each location

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Strength

If two-piece projectiles are loaded independently, then armor penetration capability is improved, but loading complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearmor penetration capabilityVSAvoidloading mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The two-piece projectile is segmented into separate components (projectile and propellant) that are stored independently in the carousal and bustle storage systems. The automated arm independently handles and loads each component into the barrel, enabling high armor penetration capability while managing complexity through modular independent loading mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The automated arm is designed with universal functionality to handle both single-piece and two-piece projectiles, as well as to draw from either carousal or bustle storage systems. This multi-functional design manages complexity by using a single versatile loading mechanism rather than separate specialized systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If autoloader is configured for fixed turret angle, then mechanism is simplified, but adaptability to different elevation angles is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloading mechanism complexityVSAvoidturret elevation adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The loading mechanism transitions from a static fixed-angle configuration to a dynamic system where the automated arm can adjust its position and orientation. The arm incorporates articulated joints and positioning mechanisms that enable it to accommodate various turret elevation angles while maintaining the ability to load projectiles accurately

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4285067B1An automated projectile loader and a method of loading projectiles for a vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.11.12 DIRECTOR GENERAL DEFENCE RES & DEV ORG
  • EP4285067B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4285067B1 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP4285067B1 patent drawingFigure 2b

AI summary

An automated projectile loader and a method of loading projectile for a vehicle is disclosed. The automated projectile loader includes a carousal projectile unit mounted on a hull of the vehicle. The carousal projectile unit includes a carousal storage adapted to store a plurality of projectiles oriented in a vertical direction. The automated projectile loader includes a bustle projectile unit disposed at a rear end of a turret of the vehicle. The bustle projectile unit includes a bustle storage adapted to store a plurality of projectiles and propellants oriented in a horizontal direction. The automated projectile loader includes an automated arm disposed below the turret and adapted to load the plurality of projectiles from one of the carousal storage and the bustle storage in a barrel orientated in any angle in the turret.