Promotion Offer Language Architecture for Consumer Behavior Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current promotion optimization methods rely on backward-looking, aggregate historical data, which fails to account for unanticipated events and individual consumer behavior, leading to inefficient promotion strategies and potential long-term damage to brand equity.

Innovation Solution

Implement a forward-looking approach by administering test promotions on purposefully segmented subpopulations to gather actual revealed preferences, allowing for iterative testing and validation of promotion variables to optimize general public promotions effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If backward-looking aggregate historical data is used for promotion optimization, then data collection is simple, but measurement precision of consumer behavior insights deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of data collectionVSAvoidprecision of consumer behavior insights
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the general population into multiple subpopulations and administers different test promotions to each segment. This segmentation allows collection of granular consumer response data that reveals individual preferences and behaviors, directly resolving the contradiction by maintaining data collection simplicity while dramatically improving measurement precision through structured segmentation and targeted testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary testing on segmented subpopulations before launching general promotions. By conducting advance tests on representative subgroups, the system gathers precise consumer behavior data without the complexity of collecting and analyzing aggregate historical data, thus improving measurement precision while keeping the process manageable through focused preliminary studies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If backward-looking aggregate historical data is used, then analysis complexity is reduced, but reliability of promotion strategy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of analysisVSAvoidreliability of promotion strategy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the population into subgroups and analyzing their distinct responses to test promotions, the patent creates more reliable promotion strategies tailored to specific consumer segments. This segmentation approach increases analysis complexity slightly but dramatically improves reliability by accounting for diverse consumer behaviors that aggregate data masks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements iterative testing where consumer responses to test promotions feed back into refined promotion designs. This feedback loop continuously improves strategy reliability by learning from actual consumer behavior rather than relying on historical aggregates, accepting increased analysis complexity as necessary for achieving dependable results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If test promotions are administered on segmented subpopulations, then measurement precision of consumer preferences improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of consumer preferencesVSAvoidcomplexity of testing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the general population into multiple subpopulations based on relevant characteristics and administers targeted test promotions to each segment. This segmentation structure improves measurement precision by capturing segment-specific preferences while managing complexity through systematic categorization rather than random individual testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The testing system is designed to serve multiple functions: it tests promotions across different segments, gathers preference data, validates strategies, and provides insights for future campaigns. This multi-functionality justifies the increased device complexity by consolidating multiple analytical tasks into a unified testing framework that improves measurement precision across all functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If iterative testing on subpopulations is conducted, then productivity of promotion optimization improves, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of promotion optimizationVSAvoidtime for testing and validation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent conducts preliminary testing on segmented subpopulations before full promotion rollout, allowing validation of promotion effectiveness in advance. This preliminary action improves overall productivity by preventing failed full-scale campaigns, accepting that some time investment in preliminary testing is necessary to avoid larger time losses from ineffective promotions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses representative subpopulations as copies or proxies for the general population. By testing on these smaller copies first and then applying validated strategies to the full population, the patent improves productivity by avoiding direct large-scale experimentation, thus reducing time loss while maintaining optimization effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11138628B2Promotion offer language and methods thereof
Publication Date: 2021.10.05 MAPLEBEAR INC
  • US11138628B2 patent drawing
  • US11138628B2 patent drawing
  • US11138628B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for implementing a promotion offer language architecture for representing offer. The promotion offer language architecture includes at least an offer type field and an offer expression field. The offer type field pertains to the type of offer. The offer expression field pertains to identification of items that the offer applies to and/or the condition required to receive the benefits of the offer type. The item is identified by a quantity and a product identification.