Promotion Optimization System Using Segmented Subpopulations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current promotion optimization methods rely on backward-looking, aggregate historical data, which fails to account for unanticipated events and individual consumer behavior, leading to inefficient promotion strategies and potential long-term negative impacts on brand equity.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a forward-looking promotion optimization approach that involves administering test promotions to purposefully segmented subpopulations, tracking actual revealed preferences, and iteratively refining promotion strategies based on real-time consumer responses to optimize promotions effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If backward-looking aggregate historical data is used for promotion optimization, then data collection is simple, but the promotion strategy effectiveness is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection simplicityVSAvoidpromotion strategy effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the general consumer population into distinct subpopulations based on demographic, geographic, and behavioral characteristics. This segmentation enables targeted test promotions to be administered to specific subpopulations, allowing for more accurate measurement of promotion effectiveness while maintaining manageable data collection processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by conducting test promotions on segmented subpopulations before launching full-scale promotions. This advance testing allows optimization of promotion strategies based on real consumer responses, improving the reliability of promotion effectiveness while maintaining systematic data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If test promotions are administered to purposefully segmented subpopulations, then promotion strategy effectiveness is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepromotion strategy effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically segments consumers into subpopulations using predefined demographic, geographic, and behavioral criteria. This automated segmentation process manages complexity by using clear, objective criteria rather than requiring manual classification, thereby maintaining system effectiveness while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where consumer responses to test promotions are automatically collected, analyzed, and used to refine segmentation criteria and optimize future promotion strategies. This automated feedback mechanism manages system complexity by using standardized data collection and analysis procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If iterative refinement of promotion strategies is implemented, then promotion return is optimized, but time and resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepromotion returnVSAvoidtime and resources consumed
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by conducting test promotions on representative subpopulations rather than the entire population. This allows iterative refinement of promotion strategies with reduced time and resource investment, while still achieving optimal promotion returns through statistically valid results from segmented testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

By conducting preliminary test promotions on segmented subpopulations before full-scale implementation, the system identifies optimal promotion strategies in advance. This preliminary action reduces the time and resources needed for full-scale promotions by eliminating the need for extensive post-implementation adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9940639B2Automated and optimal promotional experimental test designs incorporating constraints
Publication Date: 2018.04.10 MAPLEBEAR INC
  • US9940639B2 patent drawing
  • US9940639B2 patent drawing
  • US9940639B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for implementing forward looking optimizing promotions by administering, in large numbers and iteratively, test promotions formulated using highly granular test variables and automatically incorporating constraints on segmented subpopulations. The responses from individuals in the subpopulations are received and analyzed. The analysis result is employed to subsequently formulate a general public promotion.