Promotion Plan Optimization System Margin Budget Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods struggle to efficiently generate optimal promotion plans that align with enterprise objectives, particularly in handling a large number of products and variations in pricing across stores, and fail to accurately forecast the effectiveness of promotional tools and price adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that includes receiving base data for products, establishing a margin budget, and using a scenario generator and optimization engine to create and optimize a promotion plan, constrained by the margin budget, which considers allowable offers and price rules to achieve enterprise objectives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional manual methods are used to create promotion plans, then flexibility in decision-making is maintained, but the ability to handle astronomical number of products and combinations is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in decision-makingVSAvoidability to handle products and combinations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex promotion planning problem into manageable components: product data, pricing rules, promotion strategies, and optimization algorithms. Each component is processed independently and integrated to form the complete promotion plan, enabling handling of large product catalogs while maintaining decision flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a computerized optimization system as an intermediary between manual decision-making and the complex promotion planning task. This intermediary processes astronomical combinations of products and pricing scenarios, presenting optimized recommendations to human decision-makers who retain final flexibility in approval and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive promotion analysis is performed across all products and stores, then optimal promotion plans can be identified, but processing time becomes excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of promotion effectiveness forecastVSAvoidcomputer processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing product data, pricing rules, and historical sales information before the actual optimization run. Demand forecasting models are pre-configured and validated, so when promotion scenarios are evaluated, the analysis can proceed efficiently without excessive processing time while maintaining comprehensive accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by focusing optimization efforts on the most critical products, stores, and promotion scenarios rather than uniformly analyzing every possible combination. The system identifies and prioritizes high-impact opportunities, achieving near-optimal results with reduced processing time by concentrating computational resources where they yield the greatest value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Device complexity

If uniform pricing strategy is applied across all stores, then implementation complexity is reduced, but variations in product pricing across stores cannot be accommodated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation complexityVSAvoidaccommodation of pricing variations
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements local quality by allowing different pricing strategies and promotion parameters to be applied to different stores based on their specific characteristics, product mix, and market conditions. Each store can have customized pricing rules and promotion configurations within the overall enterprise framework, accommodating regional variations without requiring completely separate systems for each location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If detailed promotion scenarios are optimized for each product, then precision in meeting enterprise objectives is improved, but the complexity of managing promotions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision in meeting enterprise objectivesVSAvoidcomplexity of managing promotions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by creating a unified optimization platform that handles multiple products, stores, and promotion types through a single integrated system. The same optimization engine and algorithmic framework manage diverse promotion scenarios across the entire enterprise, reducing management complexity despite the detailed precision applied to each individual product and scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8082175B2System and method for optimization of a promotion plan
Publication Date: 2011.12.20 SAP SE
  • US8082175B2 patent drawing
  • US8082175B2 patent drawing
  • US8082175B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method (400) and system (100) for providing a promotion plan (128) for merchandising products (600) receives base data (142) for the products (600) that includes allowable offers (204) and price rules (206) that affect the offers (204). A margin budget (146) is established for the promotion plan (128) that defines an amount of margin an enterprise is willing to forgo for a promotion event implementing the promotion plan (128). A scenario (406) is generated in response to the base data (142). The scenario (406) is optimized to obtain decisions (154) for the promotion plan (128) that are constrained by the margin budget (146). The promotion plan (128), indicating the obtained decisions (154), is presented for implementation by the enterprise during the promotion event. The obtained decisions (154) include a list of the products (600), each of which is associated with one offer (204) and one price rule (206).