Promotion Price Optimization via Automated Vehicle Assignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retailers face difficulties in setting promotion prices for multiple products while balancing profitability and revenue generation, especially when faced with numerous items that require pricing during promotional events.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system and method that uses an optimizer to determine optimal promotion prices and vehicle assignments for items, considering demand models, nonlinear effects, and business constraints, employing local searching instructions and branching schemes to compute incremental changes in performance indexes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual pricing methods are used for multiple products during promotion events, then pricing decisions can be made with business rule constraints, but the complexity and time required increases significantly with the number of items

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepricing efficiencyVSAvoidpricing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual pricing mechanisms with an automated computer-implemented optimization system. The optimizer uses mathematical formulations and algorithms to automatically determine promotion prices and vehicle assignments, eliminating the need for manual pricing decisions while handling complex constraints and multiple products simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service pricing optimization where the optimizer autonomously analyzes product data, demand models, and business rules to generate optimal pricing recommendations without requiring manual intervention for each product. The system serves itself by automatically processing and optimizing pricing for all items in the catalog.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If promotion prices are reduced to generate revenue and profit, then sales volume increases, but the profitability per item decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesales volumeVSAvoidprofit margin
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The optimizer dynamically adjusts pricing parameters by analyzing demand elasticity and cross-effects between products. It determines optimal promotion prices that balance price reductions with profitability by considering how price changes affect both own-demand and cross-demand, ensuring that price cuts are optimized to maximize overall profit rather than simply increasing volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates demand models that provide feedback on how pricing decisions affect product demand. The optimizer uses this feedback to iteratively refine pricing recommendations, considering the impact of price changes on both individual product sales and overall portfolio profitability, allowing for data-driven optimization of the price-profit balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If optimization formulations consider nonlinear demand models and cross effects on demands, then pricing accuracy improves, but the computational complexity and processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepricing accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing product data, organizing it into structured formats, and preparing demand models before optimization execution. This preliminary organization of data and constraints enables the optimizer to efficiently process complex nonlinear models without excessive computation time during the actual optimization run.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If the system handles large-scale promotion scenarios with thousands of items and locations, then comprehensive coverage is achieved, but the computational burden and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem scalabilityVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the large-scale optimization problem into manageable components by organizing products, locations, and constraints into structured data formats. The optimizer processes the catalog in an organized manner, breaking down the complex large-scale problem into smaller sub-problems that can be solved efficiently while maintaining overall optimization goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8160917B1Computer-implemented promotion optimization methods and systems
Publication Date: 2012.04.17 SAS INSTITUTE INC
  • US8160917B1 patent drawing
  • US8160917B1 patent drawing
  • US8160917B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer-implemented systems and methods for determining promotion prices for a plurality of items. A system and method can be configured to receive electronic data about items for a promotion event and to receive electronic data about vehicles for a promotion event. An optimizer, which is implemented on a data processor, includes or has access to an optimization formulation for determining optimal promotion prices for the items and for determining assignments of the vehicles to the items for promoting the items during the promotion event.