Information Processing With Prompt-Based AI Selection for Accurate Responses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional AI technologies face challenges in generating appropriate responses due to varying training circumstances, leading to inconsistent and suboptimal outputs.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that selects the most suitable generative AI from a plurality of options based on information extracted from user prompts, utilizing slot filtering, extraction models, and context analysis to generate precise responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single generative AI is used to process all prompts, then the system complexity is reduced, but the response accuracy and appropriateness deteriorate due to varying training circumstances of different AI models

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the generative AI resources into multiple specialized models (e.g., text-generation AI, image-generation AI, translation AI) with different training circumstances and capabilities. Instead of using a single general-purpose AI for all tasks, the system divides the AI processing function into multiple specialized components that can be selectively applied based on the prompt requirements, thereby improving response accuracy without requiring the user to manage the complexity of selecting and configuring individual AI models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary management layer that automatically selects and coordinates multiple generative AI models based on the prompt characteristics. This intermediary component handles the complexity of AI model selection, configuration, and switching, allowing users to benefit from multiple specialized AI models without directly dealing with their individual complexities. The intermediary translates user prompts into appropriate AI model selections and manages the integration of different AI outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple generative AI models are maintained with different training circumstances, then the adaptability to various prompt types improves, but the resource consumption and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprompt handling capabilityVSAvoidAI model resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal AI management platform that can handle multiple types of generative AI models through a common interface and selection mechanism. This universal platform provides multi-functional capabilities by automatically routing different prompt types to appropriate specialized AI models (text, image, translation, etc.), allowing the system to maintain adaptability to various prompt types while avoiding the need for users to directly manage multiple AI model resources. The universal platform abstracts the complexity of resource management from the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes parameters such as AI model selection, processing mode, and resource allocation based on the characteristics of the input prompt. By analyzing prompt parameters (type, complexity, required output format), the system automatically adjusts which AI models are activated and how resources are distributed, thereby maintaining high adaptability to different prompt types while optimizing resource consumption by only activating necessary AI models on demand rather than maintaining all models in constant operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If AI selection is performed manually by users, then the ease of operation is reduced, but the transparency and user control over the AI selection process improves

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAI selection processVSAvoiduser awareness of AI characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that provide users with information about which AI model is being used and why it was selected for their prompt. This feedback can include details about the AI model's specialization, expected performance characteristics, and confidence levels. By providing this feedback, the system maintains ease of operation (automatic selection) while reducing information loss (user awareness), allowing users to understand and trust the AI selection process without needing to manually intervene in the selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250238445A1Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and non-transitory computer readable storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.07.24 LY CORP
  • US20250238445A1 patent drawing
  • US20250238445A1 patent drawing
  • US20250238445A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus according to the present application includes a reception unit, a selection unit, and a providing unit. The reception unit receives a query including a prompt sent from a user or a query for obtaining the prompt. The selection unit selects, based on information on a plurality of items included in the prompt, AI that is used to generate response information indicating a response to the prompt from among a plurality of pieces of AI. The providing unit provides the response information that has been generated by using the AI selected by the selection unit to the user.