Prompt-Aware Text-to-Image Inference Routing for Quality-Throughput Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face inefficiencies in handling high volumes of input requests from generative models, leading to latency issues, quality degradation, and inflexibility in output generation, particularly when scaling to larger networks.

Innovation Solution

The prompt-aware accuracy-scaling content inference system dynamically manages input prompts by utilizing varying approximation levels and historical affinities to direct prompts to appropriate generative model variants, minimizing quality degradation and reducing model switching overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If high approximation levels are used for all prompts, then output quality is maintained, but throughput decreases and latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput qualityVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating approximation levels based on prompt characteristics. Prompts are classified into different categories (e.g., complex vs. simple, high-quality vs. acceptable-quality) and assigned different approximation levels accordingly. This allows the system to maintain high output quality for prompts that require it while using lower approximation levels for prompts where quality can be compromised, thereby increasing overall throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the approximation level assigned to each prompt based on real-time factors including prompt load distribution, historical prompt affinities, and current system state. The approximation parameter is not fixed but adapts dynamically to balance quality and throughput requirements for each individual prompt based on its characteristics and the current system state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If multiple model variants are used to handle high loads, then throughput increases, but model switching overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidmodel switching overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of switching between different model variants, the patent changes the approximation parameter of a single generative model dynamically. By adjusting parameters such as the number of denoising iterations or other controllable model settings, the system achieves different performance levels without the overhead of model switching. This allows throughput scaling while avoiding the complexity of managing multiple model variants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If approximation levels are increased to speed up inference, then latency decreases, but output quality degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinference speedVSAvoidoutput quality
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by using lower approximation levels (which perform fewer denoising iterations or use simpler processing) for prompts where maximum quality is not critical. This partial processing achieves sufficient quality for many use cases while significantly reducing latency, accepting that not all prompts will achieve maximum quality but that the average quality-throughput tradeoff is optimized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Device complexity

If prompts are distributed uniformly across all model variants, then system simplicity is maintained, but efficiency decreases under high load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidinference efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of prompts before processing, using historical prompt affinity data and prompt characteristics to pre-determine the optimal approximation level. This preliminary action allows the system to make intelligent routing decisions in advance, assigning prompts to appropriate processing levels before execution, thereby improving efficiency without requiring complex real-time decision-making during inference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260050826A1Dynamically managing prompts and model parameters for high-throughput text-to-image inference serving
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 ADOBE INC
  • US20260050826A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050826A1 patent drawing
  • US20260050826A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure describes one or more implementations of systems that utilizes prompt-aware, accuracy-scaling inference serving to serve prompts into generative models. For instance, the disclosed systems utilize varying approximation levels in generative models to speed up model output inferences. For example, the disclosed systems determine a set of approximation parameters for a set of generative models based on a predicted input prompt load. The disclosed systems generate an input prompt distribution mapping utilizing a historical prompt affinity mapping to the set of generative models and a prompt load distribution for the set of generative models. The disclosed systems select, for an input prompt, a generative model corresponding to a particular approximation parameter based on the input prompt distribution mapping and an approximation parameter assignment for the input prompt. The disclosed systems generate an inference output for the input prompt by utilizing the input prompt with the generative model.