Prompt Processing Units for AI Productivity and Resource Visibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enterprises face challenges in effectively utilizing generative AI due to lack of visibility and control over resource consumption and inefficiencies, hindered by the inability to understand and apply task-dependent policies before prompts are processed, and lack of solutions to quantify productivity gains.

Innovation Solution

Implementing Prompt Processing Units (PPUs) to characterize and distill key features from prompts, providing visibility and insights into task requests, sensitive data usage, and resource savings, enabling sophisticated controls and productivity estimations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If enterprises adopt generative AI models, then productivity is improved, but resource consumption increases and visibility/control over data usage is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidvisibility and control over sensitive data
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces Prompt Processing Units (PPUs) as intermediary components between users and generative AI models. These PPUs intercept, analyze, and process prompts before they reach the model, enabling enterprises to monitor and control data usage while maintaining productivity benefits. The PPUs serve as a mediating layer that provides visibility into prompt contents, model interactions, and resource consumption without preventing generative AI adoption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If enterprises use generative AI models, then task completion speed is improved, but resource consumption and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion speedVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through PPUs that continuously monitor resource consumption, prompt characteristics, and model performance. This feedback enables dynamic adjustment of generative AI usage strategies, allowing enterprises to optimize the balance between task completion speed and resource consumption. The system can identify patterns and adjust prompting strategies to reduce unnecessary resource usage while maintaining productivity gains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of manufacture

If enterprises deploy generative AI without observability tools, then implementation is simpler, but ability to apply task-dependent policies and measure productivity gains is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidability to quantify productivity gains
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements observability functionality through PPUs that are integrated into the prompt processing pipeline before prompts reach the generative AI model. This preliminary action enables enterprises to capture metrics, analyze prompt characteristics, and apply policies before model execution, rather than requiring complex post-processing analysis. The PPUs perform characterization and measurement upfront, making productivity quantification straightforward while maintaining implementation simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250251986A1Prompt observability and estimated productivity gain insights using prompt processing units
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20250251986A1 patent drawing
  • US20250251986A1 patent drawing
  • US20250251986A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one implementation, a method is disclosed comprising: estimating, by a device, an amount of time that a large language model would take to perform a task indicated by a prompt; estimating, by a device, an amount of time that one or more users would take to perform the task indicated by the prompt; determining, by the device, a resource savings associated with the large language model performing the task, based on a comparison between the amount of time that the large language model would take to perform the task and the amount of time that the one or more users would take to perform the task; and providing, by the device, an indication of the resource savings for display by a user interface.