Prompt Tuning with Semantic Search and Meta-Prompt Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems face challenges in selecting appropriate datasets for prompt training due to the lack of context-based search refinement, and transfer learning is difficult due to computational resource requirements and expertise needs.

Innovation Solution

Implementing semantic search and meta-prompt generation to identify and refine prompts, using a prompt tuning training API that allows users to leverage large models without revealing their datasets, and utilizing meta-prompts to generate prompts efficiently.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If transfer learning is used for large pretrained models, then model performance is improved, but computational resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidcomputational resource requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training process into two distinct phases: (1) pre-training the model on large-scale datasets, and (2) fine-tuning on smaller task-specific datasets. This segmentation allows the computationally intensive pre-training to be performed once, while subsequent fine-tuning requires minimal computational resources, thus resolving the contradiction between achieving high performance and reducing ongoing computational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing comprehensive pre-training on large pretrained models before deployment. This preliminary training establishes a strong foundation that enables the model to achieve state-of-the-art performance while requiring minimal computational resources during actual use, as the heavy lifting has already been completed in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Quantity of substance

If data expansion is based on similarity between examples, then dataset size increases, but relevance to the desired task decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedataset sizeVSAvoidtask relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms during the fine-tuning process where the model's performance on task-specific evaluation data continuously guides the selection and weighting of training examples. This feedback loop ensures that data expansion prioritizes examples that actually improve task performance rather than merely increasing dataset size, thus maintaining high task relevance while expanding the training data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters used for data selection from simple similarity metrics to task-performance-oriented criteria. By adjusting the selection parameters to prioritize examples that demonstrate successful task completion or high relevance scores, the system expands the dataset while maintaining or improving task relevance, resolving the contradiction between quantity and quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If prompt tuning is performed without semantic search, then processing speed is maintained, but data selection quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoiddata selection quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by implementing semantic search selectively rather than for all data processing operations. Semantic search is used specifically for identifying and retrieving relevant prompts from the repository during the fine-tuning phase, while other processing operations maintain standard speed. This selective application preserves overall processing efficiency while significantly improving data selection quality where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary semantic search mechanism that acts as a bridge between the available prompt repository and the fine-tuning process. This intermediary component efficiently retrieves highly relevant prompts without requiring exhaustive processing of all available data, thus improving data selection quality while maintaining acceptable processing speeds through intelligent intermediation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12619604B2Prompt tuning using one or more machine-learned models
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12619604B2 patent drawing
  • US12619604B2 patent drawing
  • US12619604B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for prompt tuning can leverage semantic searching for determining similar prompts to use for retraining. A prompt can be generated then searched to find the similar prompts. Data related to the similar prompts can then be utilized for prompt tuning. Moreover, systems and methods for prompt tuning can generate and utilize a meta-prompt to reduce the computational cost of generating prompts. The prompt tuning techniques can be implemented as part of a prompt tuning application programming interface (API).