Proof of Reception Validation Protocol for Distributed Transaction Networks
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing transaction systems rely on consensus mechanisms like proof of work and proof of stake, which consume significant computational resources and can concentrate control among a few entities, leading to inefficiencies and potential attacks.
Innovation Solution
A distributed transaction network that uses a proof of reception validation protocol, allowing self-validation of transactions without third-party interference, and operates without relying on proof of work or proof of stake consensus mechanisms.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If proof of work consensus mechanism is used, then transaction validation is achieved, but computational resource expenditure increases significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts the validation function from third-party miners and returns it to the transacting parties themselves. The sender and receiver directly validate the transaction through digital signatures and hash verification, eliminating the need for external proof-of-work validation while maintaining security and reliability.
Solution Approach 2:
The transaction parties perform self-validation using cryptographic proofs. The sender proves ownership through digital signatures, and the receiver validates the transaction through hash verification, making the system self-sufficient without requiring energy-intensive third-party validation services.
2Reliability
If proof of stake consensus mechanism is used, then transaction validation is achieved, but network control concentrates among entities with large resource portions
Solution Approach 1:
The patent removes the staking mechanism entirely, extracting the validation function from resource-rich entities and returning it to all transacting parties. This eliminates the concentration of power while maintaining validation reliability through cryptographic proofs.
Solution Approach 2:
Every user becomes their own validator through self-validation, eliminating the need for a privileged class of validators. This democratizes network control while maintaining security through cryptographic verification of transaction authenticity.
3Reliability
If third-party miners validate transactions, then transaction security is achieved, but transaction fees and time delays are introduced
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts the validation function from third-party miners and returns it to the transacting parties. This eliminates the intermediary layer that introduces fees and delays, while maintaining security through cryptographic verification.
Solution Approach 2:
The transaction parties immediately validate and confirm transactions themselves without waiting for third-party miners. This self-service approach eliminates transaction fees and reduces confirmation time from minutes to seconds, while maintaining security through digital signatures and hash verification.
Data Source
AI summary
In an example method, a distributed transaction network includes a first computing node and a second computing node. The second computing node receives a data record from the first computing node, including an indication of a proposed transaction, an indication of a transaction value associated with the proposed transaction, and an indication of a smart contract associated with the proposed transaction. The second computing node validates the proposed transaction. Upon validating the proposed transaction, the second computing node receives the transaction value from the first computing node, and adds a transaction record to a distributed ledger of the distributed transaction network to indicate receipt of the transaction value from the first computing node.