Propane Dehydrogenation Reactor with Continuous Catalyst Circulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current propane dehydrogenation processes for propylene production are hindered by high temperature requirements, catalyst degradation, and coking, leading to inefficient reaction rates and frequent catalyst regeneration needs.

Innovation Solution

A fast fluidized reactor process for propane dehydrogenation with continuous catalyst circulation, using non-metal catalysts like zirconia and chromia, and rapid regeneration to maintain uniform temperature and minimize coke formation, with a catalyst residence time of 15-45 minutes and regeneration time of less than 30 minutes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high temperature is used to drive the dehydrogenation reaction at a satisfactory rate, then reaction rate is improved, but catalyst degradation and coking increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction rateVSAvoidcatalyst stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous catalyst circulation between a dehydrogenation reactor and a regenerator. The catalyst is continuously regenerated by burning off coke deposits in the regenerator and then returned to the reactor, maintaining continuous catalytic activity without interrupting the dehydrogenation process. This resolves the contradiction by ensuring the catalyst remains stable and active over extended periods despite the harsh high-temperature conditions required for high reaction rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a two-reactor system with different operating conditions. The first reactor operates at lower temperature (500-650°C) to minimize coking, while the second reactor operates at higher temperature (650-800°C) to maximize dehydrogenation rate. The catalyst is sequentially used in both reactors and then regenerated. This parameter change approach allows the system to achieve high overall productivity while managing catalyst stability through controlled temperature variations in different reaction zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If long catalyst residence time is used in the reactor, then conversion efficiency is improved, but catalyst deactivation and coking increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiencyVSAvoidcatalyst residence time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous circulation system ensures that catalyst spent in the first reactor is rapidly transferred to the second reactor for further utilization, and then quickly regenerated and returned. This continuous action maximizes the productive use of each catalyst cycle while preventing excessive residence time that would lead to deactivation. The system maintains an optimal balance by continuously moving catalyst through different functional zones rather than allowing it to remain stationary for extended periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the catalyst usage into distinct segments: first reactor usage, inter-reactor transfer, second reactor usage, and regeneration. Each segment has an optimized duration. The catalyst resides in the first reactor for a controlled period (15-60 minutes), is quickly transferred, then used in the second reactor (15-60 minutes), followed by rapid regeneration (30-120 minutes). This segmentation allows high conversion efficiency in each reactor while limiting total exposure to deactivating conditions through the structured time divisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If frequent catalyst regeneration is performed, then catalyst activity is maintained, but overall productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst activityVSAvoidoverall productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous regeneration where spent catalyst from the second reactor is immediately fed to the regenerator, which operates continuously to burn off coke deposits. The regenerated catalyst is then quickly returned to the first reactor without interruption. This continuous regeneration process maintains high catalyst activity throughout operation while minimizing the time catalyst is non-productive, thereby preserving overall system productivity despite the frequent regeneration cycles required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Temperature

If fast fluidized reactor is used to provide uniform temperature, then reaction uniformity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature uniformityVSAvoidreactor complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a fluidized catalyst bed as an intermediary heat transfer medium. The catalyst particles are fluidized and circulate continuously between reactors and regenerator, acting as a moving heat carrier. This fluidized system provides excellent heat distribution and temperature uniformity throughout the reactor volume due to the intense mixing of catalyst particles. The complexity is managed by using the catalyst itself as the heat transfer medium rather than requiring complex external heating/cooling systems, thus achieving temperature uniformity through the natural dynamics of fluidized bed operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process enhances propylene production efficiency by maintaining uniform temperature, reducing catalyst deactivation, and increasing overall flow rates, potentially scaling up propylene production from 500 KMTA to 1000 KMTA with reduced coke formation and improved catalyst longevity.

Implementation Method 1

The reactor is a fast fluidizing reactor, where the reactor is operated in a flow regime to turbulently mix the catalyst and feedstream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulent mixing: Turbulence

Implementation Method 2

The reactor is a fast fluidizing reactor to provide well mixed reactants and feedstream and to provide a uniform temperature over the reactor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluidization: Fluidisation

Implementation Method 3

The dehydrogenation of propane through catalytic dehydrogenation... The feedstream is contacted with a fluidized catalyst in the dehydrogenation reactor, thereby generating a product stream comprising propylene

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalytic dehydrogenation: Catalysis

Implementation Method 4

The reaction is strongly endothermic, and requires a high temperature for the reaction to proceed at a satisfactory rate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEndothermic reaction: Endothermic Reaction

Implementation Method 5

The spent catalyst is passed to a catalyst regeneration unit, to regenerate the catalyst for return to the dehydrogenation reactor... The catalyst is processed in the regeneration unit under conditions to limit the average residence time in the regeneration unit to 30 minutes or less

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS8624074B2Reactor flowscheme for dehydrogenation of propane to propylene
Publication Date: 2014.01.07 UOP LLC
  • US8624074B2 patent drawing
  • US8624074B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for the dehydrogenation of paraffins is presented. The process utilizes a rapid recycling of dehydrogenation catalyst between the dehydrogenation reactor and the catalyst regeneration unit. The process comprises preheating a combined hydrogen and paraffin hydrocarbon feedstream and passing the combined stream to a dehydrogenation reactor. The hydrocarbon feedstream and the catalyst pass through the reactor at a rate to limit the average residence time of the catalyst in the reactor. The catalyst is cycled to a regeneration unit, and passed through the regeneration unit to limit the average residence time of the catalyst in the regeneration unit.