Propeller Blade Angle Sensor Testing Under Variable Rotation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for testing propeller blade angle sensors lack the ability to accurately determine whether the sensors are within acceptable manufacturing tolerances, especially under varying operational conditions, which can lead to inaccurate blade angle measurements and potential aircraft hazards.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for testing propeller blade angle position feedback sensors using a test mount that simulates engine operating conditions, involving precise alignment and controlled rotation speeds, and performing peak voltage detection tests at multiple rotational speeds to ensure sensor accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing testing methods are used for propeller blade angle sensors, then the testing process is simple, but the measurement precision and reliability of sensor accuracy determination deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor accuracyVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual model of the propeller blade angle sensor system that replicates the physical sensor's behavior and characteristics. This virtual copy allows for comprehensive testing and validation without requiring complex physical test setups, thereby improving measurement precision while avoiding proportional increases in physical device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a signal processing intermediary that mediates between the physical sensor and the testing apparatus. This intermediary layer processes and validates sensor signals through multiple verification steps, enhancing measurement precision while maintaining manageable system complexity by modularizing the testing approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If sensors are tested under limited operational conditions, then the testing time is reduced, but the reliability of sensor performance across varying conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor performance reliabilityVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic testing capabilities that allow the testing system to automatically adjust operational parameters such as rotational speed and blade angle positions. This dynamic approach enables comprehensive reliability validation across varying conditions without requiring manual reconfiguration for each test scenario, thereby improving reliability while minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic testing cycles that systematically vary operational conditions through defined test sequences. By organizing comprehensive reliability testing into structured periodic cycles, the system achieves thorough validation across multiple operating conditions without requiring continuous manual intervention, thus improving reliability while controlling testing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive testing at multiple rotational speeds and positions is performed, then the reliability and measurement precision improve, but the productivity and testing efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade angle measurement accuracyVSAvoidsensor testing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary characterization of sensor behavior at representative operating points before conducting full comprehensive testing. This preliminary action allows the system to identify potential issues early and adjust testing parameters, thereby achieving high measurement precision while reducing the total number of test iterations required, thus maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies testing parameters such as rotational speed, blade angle position, and signal amplitude according to optimized test matrices. By strategically selecting parameter combinations that provide maximum information with minimum tests, the system achieves comprehensive validation of measurement precision while preserving testing throughput and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures that the sensors meet manufacturing tolerances and provide accurate blade angle measurements, reducing the risk of operational errors and ensuring safe aircraft operation.

Implementation Method 1

a voltage sensor for receiving a sensor signal from the sensor while the feedback device is rotated at a known speed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP4011763B1Method and system for testing a sensor of a propeller blade angle position feedback system
Publication Date: 2025.09.24 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • EP4011763B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4011763B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4011763B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

Methods and systems for testing a sensor (306) of a propeller blade angle position feedback system. A sensor signal is received from a sensor (306) at a known position relative to a feedback device (200), the feedback device (200) comprising a ring (304) and at least one pair of position markers (302) spaced from one another around a circumference thereof, the sensor (306) configured for successively detecting passage of the position markers (302) as the feedback device (200) rotates at a known rotational speed and an axial distance between the sensor (306) and the feedback device (200) varies. From the sensor signal a measured position of the sensor (306) relative to the feedback device (200) and a measured rotational speed of the feedback device (200) are determined. The measured position and the measured rotational speed are compared to the known position and the known rotational speed to determine a sensor accuracy.