Non-Ducted Propeller Blade Modeling for Noise Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Non-ducted propeller engines face challenges in reducing noise levels without compromising performance or increasing fuel consumption, as current modeling methods struggle to effectively manage wing-tip vortices and acoustics, especially in areas near the ground during takeoff and approach.

Innovation Solution

A method for modeling non-ducted propeller blades with an offset, using data processing to parameterize and optimize deformation parameters of a curve representing the blade's deformation, specifically employing non-uniform rational B-splines (NURBS) and auxiliary curves to minimize wing-tip vortex intensity, thereby reducing noise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If current modeling methods (2D profiles wrapped around streamlines) are used for non-ducted propellers, then manufacturing and design simplicity is maintained, but noise levels cannot meet specification thresholds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise levelsVSAvoidmodeling method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the parameterization approach from traditional 2D profile wrapping to a direct 3D surface parameterization using control points and deformation parameters. This allows optimization of blade geometry (particularly at tips) to reduce wing-tip vortices and noise while maintaining design flexibility through parameter control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces an intermediary modeling layer between conventional design and final geometry: a parameterized surface model with control points that mediates between simple design inputs and complex noise-reducing geometries, enabling optimization without direct mesh deformation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If mesh deforming algorithms are used to improve blade geometry, then surface cleanliness and ease of drawing are achieved, but significant development work is required before industrial usability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface cleanlinessVSAvoiddevelopment work required
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of directly deforming complex meshes, the invention creates a simplified parametric copy of the blade surface defined by control points and deformation parameters. This copy can be easily manipulated and optimized, then transferred to the final geometry, avoiding the complexity of direct mesh deformation algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Object-affected harmful factors

If blade tip geometries are modified to reduce wing-tip vortices, then noise levels decrease, but engine effectiveness and fuel consumption may be impacted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewing-tip vortex intensityVSAvoidengine effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality changes by focusing geometric modifications primarily at the blade tips where vortices form, while maintaining conventional geometries in the root and mid-sections. The parameterized model allows independent control of tip deformation parameters without affecting overall blade performance characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces dynamic adaptability through parameterized deformation that can be optimized for different operating conditions. The control parameters allow the blade geometry to be adjusted dynamically during design optimization to balance noise reduction with performance maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10387611B2Method for modeling a blade of a non-ducted propeller
Publication Date: 2019.08.20 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • US10387611B2 patent drawing
  • US10387611B2 patent drawing
  • US10387611B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for modeling an offset portion of a blade of a non-ducted propeller is provided. The method includes: parametrizing a C1-class curve representing a deformation of the blade characterizing the offset, according to a position along a section at a given height in the blade, the curve intersecting consecutively through a first bend control point, a central control point, and a second bend control point, the first and second bend control points defining the extent of the blade section, the parametrization being implemented according to a first deformation parameter defining the abscissa of the central control point, a second parameter of deformation defining the ordinate of the second bend point, and a third deformation parameter defining the angle of the tangent to the curve at the second bend control point; optimizing one of the deformation parameters; and plotting the values of the optimized parameters on an interface.