Ultra-quiet Propeller Blade Stiffness and Thrust Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current propeller designs for urban air mobility and quiet regional sky transit face challenges in reducing noise, particularly due to high vortex noise levels, which are exacerbated by high blade velocities and limited by structural and vibrational constraints, necessitating innovative approaches to minimize noise emissions during take-off and initial climb.

Innovation Solution

The development of ultra-quiet propellers with high aspect ratio blades, strategically designed blade shapes, and operational strategies that include reduced tip speeds, customized airfoil sections, and thrust distributions to minimize noise, combined with advanced materials like carbon fiber and aramid fibers for increased stiffness and vibration damping, along with the use of Fibonacci intervals for localized blade stiffness changes to dampen resonant vibrations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If blade velocity is increased to provide sufficient thrust, then thrust capability is improved, but vortex noise increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethrustVSAvoidvortex noise
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying blade geometry parameters including aspect ratio, twist distribution, and airfoil section characteristics to optimize the balance between thrust generation and noise reduction. By changing these geometric parameters, the system achieves sufficient thrust while minimizing vortex noise through improved airflow characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials such as carbon fiber and aramid fibers in blade construction to achieve high stiffness-to-weight ratios. This allows the blades to maintain structural integrity at high aspect ratios while reducing overall weight, enabling the system to operate at lower blade velocities for reduced noise while still providing necessary thrust capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-generated harmful factors

If high aspect ratio blades are used to reduce vortex noise, then noise is reduced, but blade stiffness and vibration resistance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevortex noiseVSAvoidblade stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite materials including carbon fiber and aramid fibers to create blades with high stiffness-to-weight ratios. These composites provide the necessary structural rigidity to maintain blade stiffness even at high aspect ratios, preventing excessive flexing and vibration while minimizing vortex noise through the slender blade geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by varying the cross-sectional characteristics of the blade along its span. The blade geometry is optimized with different airfoil sections, twist angles, and chord lengths at different radial positions to concentrate stiffness where needed while maintaining the overall high aspect ratio for noise reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-generated harmful factors

If blade velocity is reduced to minimize noise, then vortex noise is reduced, but thrust capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevortex noiseVSAvoidthrust capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies propeller operating parameters including rotational speed, blade pitch angle, and advance ratio to optimize thrust generation at reduced blade velocities. By adjusting these parameters, the system maintains adequate thrust capability while operating at lower speeds that minimize vortex noise emissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic control mechanisms including variable pitch propellers and active vibration control systems that adjust blade characteristics in real-time during operation. This allows the propeller to optimize its performance dynamically, maintaining thrust when needed while minimizing noise during operation phases where noise reduction is prioritized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If conventional propeller designs are used, then structural simplicity is maintained, but noise reduction capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepropeller design complexityVSAvoidrotational and vortex noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing specialized noise reduction features at specific locations on the blade, such as leading edge modifications, trailing edge treatments, and localized stiffening elements. These targeted modifications address specific noise generation mechanisms without requiring complete redesign of the entire propeller system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary elements such as vibration dampers, acoustic liners, and flow control surfaces that act as mediators between the blade structure and the airflow. These intermediary components help reduce noise by absorbing vibrations, modifying airflow patterns, and reducing vortex formation without significantly complicating the overall propeller design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These designs significantly reduce propeller noise, meeting stringent community noise standards by minimizing both rotational and vortex noise sources, while maintaining sufficient thrust and structural integrity for high-proximity aviation applications.

Implementation Method 1

advanced materials like carbon fiber and aramid fibers for increased stiffness and vibration damping

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration damping: Damping

Implementation Method 2

the use of Fibonacci intervals for localized blade stiffness changes to dampen resonant vibrations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectResonant vibration damping: Damping

Implementation Method 3

high aspect ratio blades, strategically designed blade shapes, and operational strategies that include reduced tip speeds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex noise reduction:

Data Source

PatentUS11333160B2Ultra-quiet propeller system
Publication Date: 2022.05.17 SEELEY BRIEN AVEN
  • US11333160B2 patent drawing
  • US11333160B2 patent drawing
  • US11333160B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A propeller system combines innovative strategies to create a new methodology to reduce propeller or rotor noise. The propeller is specifically aimed for ultra-quiet electrically powered aircraft for use in high proximity aviation, but its low-noise advantages will extend to other purposes. The propeller blade includes geometries, along with size and operational limitations that minimize rotational and vortex noise, vibration and span-wise air flow on the blade. To further reduce noise, the propeller provides greater relative thrust on the inboard portions of the blade than do conventional propellers and provides less than conventional relative thrust including negative thrust at the outermost portions of the blade. The propeller blade includes stepped changes in local blade stiffness at calculated intervals that can reduce resonant blade vibrations and their resultant noise. This ultra-quiet propeller design can also be used for quieting hovercraft, drones, surveillance aircraft, indoor fans, wind tunnels and other applications.