Propeller Vane Pitch Control with Geometric Failsafe Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies for controlling the pitch of propeller vanes in aircraft turbine engines are complex, expensive, and lack a reliable failsafe mechanism to prevent vane detachment and impact on the aircraft fuselage.

Innovation Solution

A pitch control system for propeller vanes that includes a vane with a blade connected to a root, a hub with an annular wall, a ring with a perforated intermediate wall, abutments engaged in openings, and a nut that secures the assembly, providing radial preload and a failsafe mechanism.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If current technologies for controlling pitch are used, then the propeller can change pitch angle to adapt thrust, but the system becomes complex and expensive without reliable failsafe mechanism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepitch adaptation capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pitch control system is divided into modular components: a pitch control unit with motor and driver, separate abutment elements, and a hub assembly. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each component and simplifies maintenance while maintaining full pitch adaptation capability across the flight domain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Abutment elements are introduced as intermediary components between the pitch control unit and the vane root. These abutments transmit the pitch control forces while providing a failsafe mechanism through their geometric engagement, reducing the complexity of the overall control system while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If current retention technologies are used, then the vane can be attached to the hub, but the system lacks failsafe mechanism to prevent vane detachment on failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevane retention capabilityVSAvoidfailsafe mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The abutment elements are designed with geometric features that provide inherent failsafe protection. If the primary retention mechanism fails, the abutments' shape and positioning ensure the vane remains retained through passive geometric constraint, providing beforehand protection against catastrophic detachment without requiring active monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The hub assembly incorporates localized reinforcement features and specific geometric configurations at the vane root engagement area. This local quality enhancement provides both strong retention capability and inherent failsafe properties through the tailored geometry of the hub and abutment interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If larger and denser elements are used in control systems, then the failsafe function is improved, but the mass of the aircraft increases impacting performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailsafe functionVSAvoidaircraft mass
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The abutment elements are designed to be self-retaining through their geometric configuration. The failsafe function is achieved through the inherent shape and engagement features of the abutments themselves, eliminating the need for additional heavy shielding or reinforcement structures, thus maintaining aircraft performance while ensuring reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The design optimizes the geometric parameters of the abutment elements and hub interface to achieve maximum retention and failsafe capability with minimal mass. By carefully selecting and optimizing dimensional parameters, the system achieves reliable failsafe function without requiring oversized components that would increase aircraft weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If the vane is securely retained during operation, then the risk of impact on fuselage is reduced, but the assembly and disassembly process becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevane retention during operationVSAvoidassembly and disassembly ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The vane assembly is segmented into the vane root, abutment elements, and hub components. This segmentation allows for simple modular assembly and disassembly operations while maintaining secure retention during operation. Each component can be independently installed and removed without affecting the entire propeller assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The abutment elements are designed with dynamic engagement features that automatically lock into place during operation to ensure secure vane retention. During assembly and disassembly, the same geometric features provide guided engagement and disengagement, simplifying the maintenance process while ensuring operational reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system allows for easy assembly and disassembly of the vane without disassembling the hub, provides a robust failsafe mechanism to retain the vane in case of failure, and ensures the vane is immobilized and retained during operation, reducing the risk of damage to the fuselage.

Implementation Method 1

a nut (42) screwed onto the thread (78) of the ring (38) and configured to bear axially on the hub (36) so that tightening the nut forces the lower wall (74) of the ring (38) to bear on the lower bearing surface (32a) of the bulb (32) of the root (14), the upper bearing surface (32b) of this bulb (32) to bear on the abutments (40), and these abutments (40) to bear on complementary support surfaces (60b, 64a, 68a) of the at least one housing (64, 68) of the hub (36)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew mechanism: Screw

Implementation Method 2

the lower bearing surface (32a) of the bulb (32) of the root (14) being configured so as to bear, at least in the axial direction, on this lower wall (74), on the side opposite the blade (12) of the vane (10)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical bearing: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 3

the upper bearing surface (32b) of the bulb (32) of the root (14) being configured so as to bear, at least in the axial direction, on these abutments (40), on the blade side of the vane (10)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical bearing: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 4

these abutments (40) to bear on complementary support surfaces (60b, 64a, 68a) of the at least one housing (64, 68) of the hub (36)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical constraint: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentUS12331647B2System for controlling the pitch setting of a propeller vane for an aircraft turbine engine
Publication Date: 2025.06.17 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • US12331647B2 patent drawing
  • US12331647B2 patent drawing
  • US12331647B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for controlling the pitch setting of a propeller blade for an aircraft turbine engine, includes a blade having a vane connected to a root. A hub accommodates the root of the blade, and a ring is mounted around the root and in the hub. Stops are also mounted around the root and in the hub. A nut is threadedly engaged with a thread of the ring and is configured to bear axially against the hub to secure the assembly.