Adaptable Property Inspection Model for Risk-Based Insurance Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The high cost and customer unfriendliness associated with the large percentage of property inspections required for insurance coverage, leading to increased costs for insurance providers and potential policy cancellations without adequate customer notification.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using an adaptable inspection model to determine the insurability risk score of properties, comparing it to constraints, and ordering inspections only when necessary, thereby reducing unnecessary inspections and providing real-time notifications to customers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If every property is inspected to minimize insurance risk, then insurance provider risk exposure is reduced, but inspection costs increase and customer satisfaction decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsurance risk managementVSAvoidinspection costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of inspection frequency from universal (100% of properties) to selective (based on risk scores). Properties are scored on a continuum, and only those exceeding a threshold are inspected, transforming the binary inspection decision into a graded risk-based approach that reduces overall inspection volume while maintaining adequate risk management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses historical inspection data and property characteristics to create predictive risk models that copy patterns from past inspections. These models estimate property risk without physical inspection, allowing the system to identify which properties truly need inspection versus those that can be safely excluded based on similarities to previously inspected properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If every property is inspected to ensure quality coverage, then insurance policy quality is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy qualityVSAvoidinspection processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary risk assessment using automated scoring models before committing to physical inspections. By evaluating property characteristics, location data, and historical patterns in advance, the system pre-identifies which properties warrant inspection, eliminating the need to process all properties through the full inspection workflow and thereby reducing overall processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The property portfolio is segmented into different risk categories based on scoring thresholds. High-risk properties undergo full inspection while low-risk properties are processed through expedited channels or excluded from inspection requirements entirely. This segmentation allows parallel processing of different property types, reducing the time bottleneck associated with universal inspection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If a high percentage of properties are flagged for inspection, then insurance provider risk control is improved, but operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk controlVSAvoidinspection coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the complex multi-factor inspection decision process into a single risk score parameter that incorporates all relevant factors (property age, location, characteristics, historical data). This parameter consolidation simplifies the coordination process by providing a clear threshold-based decision rule rather than requiring complex evaluation of multiple independent criteria

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual inspection coordination with automated computer-based risk scoring and decision algorithms. The automated system generates inspection lists, schedules, and notifications without human intervention, eliminating the operational complexity of manually coordinating inspections across multiple properties and inspectors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10572947B1Adaptable property inspection model
Publication Date: 2020.02.25 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US10572947B1 patent drawing
  • US10572947B1 patent drawing
  • US10572947B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer executable instructions may be used to configure a special purpose computing device to perform a method for determining whether an unbound property insurance lead may be associated with a property for which a property inspection is not required. The computer executable instructions, when executed by a processor may cause the special purpose computing device to access a data repository storing a plurality of unbound property insurance leads, process each of the plurality of unbound property insurance leads using an adaptable inspection model to determine an insurability risk score for each of the unbound property insurance leads, compare each insurability risk score to a constraint, and communicate an indication of whether a property inspection is necessary for each of the plurality of unbound property insurance leads.