Property Management System Floor Plan Issue Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Property management systems face challenges in efficiently managing and prioritizing issues across large properties with multiple tenants/users, including communication and scheduling complexities, especially when dealing with varying urgency levels of problems like misaligned doors and leaking pipes.

Innovation Solution

A computerized property management system that utilizes floor plans and problem type icons to facilitate issue identification and notification, allowing users to select issues, input details, and automatically generate service requests, which are then processed to alert relevant parties, including service technicians and property managers, with features for checklist generation and scheduling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual property management methods are used, then flexibility in handling diverse issues is maintained, but efficiency and response time deteriorate due to the multitude of problems across hundreds of units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproperty management efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments property management by dividing the property into floor plans with multiple zones, and further segments issues by problem type categories. This hierarchical segmentation allows efficient organization and tracking of numerous issues across hundreds of units without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The property management system serves multiple functions: tracking maintenance issues, managing construction projects, handling punch out lists, scheduling communications, and facilitating contractor communication. This multi-functionality consolidates various management tasks into a single system, improving overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If detailed tracking of each issue is implemented, then problem resolution accuracy is improved, but time consumption increases due to the need to manually log and follow up on each problem

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveissue tracking accuracyVSAvoidtime for issue tracking
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables tenants to self-report issues by selecting problem types and locations on floor plans, eliminating the need for manual logging by property managers. The system automatically generates service requests, tracks them through resolution, and manages communications, significantly reducing time consumption while maintaining detailed tracking accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-establishes problem type categories and associated communication protocols before issues arise. When an issue is reported, the predetermined categories and notification rules are automatically applied, eliminating the need for manual classification and follow-up planning, thus improving accuracy without increasing time investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Speed

If automated notification systems are implemented, then communication speed is improved, but system complexity increases due to multiple communication protocols and stakeholder coordination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication speedVSAvoidcommunication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The communication system applies different notification methods and protocols tailored to specific problem types and stakeholder roles. For example, urgent issues may trigger immediate alerts to property managers and contractors, while routine maintenance may use standard email notifications. This localized approach to communication maintains speed while managing complexity through context-appropriate protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If comprehensive service request tracking is implemented, then problem resolution reliability is improved, but operational complexity increases due to monitoring and coordination requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice request resolution reliabilityVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback loops where service requests are automatically notified to relevant parties, status updates are tracked and communicated, and resolution confirmation is obtained and recorded. This automated feedback mechanism ensures reliable tracking and coordination without requiring manual monitoring, thus improving reliability while minimizing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10825118B2Property management system
Publication Date: 2020.11.03 OBROKTA ERIC
  • US10825118B2 patent drawing
  • US10825118B2 patent drawing
  • US10825118B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computerized property management system enables users to input a service request by placing a problem-type icon on a floor plan and designating a priority or urgency for the service request. The user can select a problem type note and/or input text describing the problem. Additionally, the user can add photographs, voice notes or video. After the service request is submitted, a contractor is notified of the request by email or text, which includes a link to the service request page with the information entered by the user. After the service request task is completed, the contractor can add notes describing what was fixed and indicating that the task has been completed. Subsequently, an email or other communication may be sent to the property manager and the requestor to indicate that the task has been completed.