Property Risk Score Calculation for Insurance Underwriting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current property insurance inspection data processing systems lack cumulative analysis, leading to inconsistent and incorrect underwriting referrals and insurance coverage determinations, as they primarily rely on binary decisions and subjective judgments rather than objective assessment of multiple factors.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that receive property data to determine a risk score reflecting the cumulative effect of various attributes, facilitating insurance coverage determination by generating categories based on this score, and supporting decisions such as policy availability, pricing, and underwriting referrals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If property inspection data is processed using binary decisions and subjective judgments, then the processing is simple and quick, but the accuracy and consistency of underwriting referrals deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidaccuracy of underwriting referrals
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the processing approach from binary decisions (yes/no flags for each property characteristic) to a continuous risk score parameter. Multiple property characteristics are converted into weighted numerical values that contribute to an overall risk score, enabling more nuanced and accurate risk assessment while maintaining automated processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a risk score as an intermediary between raw property inspection data and underwriting decisions. This intermediary parameter aggregates multiple property characteristics through weighted scoring, providing a consistent objective basis for underwriting referrals that improves accuracy while preserving processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If multiple property characteristics are assessed individually with binary flags, then the data collection is straightforward, but the cumulative risk assessment capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of data collectionVSAvoidcumulative risk assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual property characteristic assessments into a unified risk score. Each property characteristic (roof condition, siding condition, age, etc.) is assigned a weighted value based on its risk significance, and these values are combined to produce an overall risk score that reflects cumulative risk accurately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms discrete binary flags into continuous weighted parameters. Instead of treating each property characteristic as a simple yes/no flag, the system assigns numerical weights that reflect the relative importance and risk contribution of each characteristic, enabling accurate cumulative risk assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual assessment of inspection data is performed, then subjective judgment can be applied, but consistency and objectivity of coverage determinations deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in judgmentVSAvoidconsistency of coverage determinations
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a standardized feedback mechanism where property characteristics are systematically evaluated against predetermined weightings and scoring criteria. This structured approach ensures that the same assessment rules are applied consistently across all properties, eliminating variability introduced by subjective human judgment while maintaining objectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts subjective judgment into objective parameter-based assessment. By assigning numerical weights to property characteristics and calculating risk scores through standardized formulas, the system achieves consistent and reproducible coverage determinations that are free from human subjectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8027850B1Property insurance risk assessment processing system and method
Publication Date: 2011.09.27 MILLENIUM TECH SERVICES
  • US8027850B1 patent drawing
  • US8027850B1 patent drawing
  • US8027850B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a method of facilitating an insurance coverage determination for a property based on a plurality of characteristic elements relevant to the insurance coverage determination. The method includes receiving property data indicative of attributes of the property for the plurality of characteristic elements, determining a property risk score for the property based on the property data, and supporting the insurance coverage determination with the property risk score.