Property Value Estimation Using Feature Distance Regression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional property value estimation methods are inefficient with large datasets, rely on subjective appraiser judgment, and fail to provide customized estimates, often relying on inaccurate prior assessments and simplistic valuation models.

Innovation Solution

A computationally efficient method using feature distances between a target property and comparable properties, calculated through regression analysis, to determine property values, independent of physical distance, with an adaptive grid and sub-market partitioning for enhanced accuracy, allowing for customized and accurate value estimation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If automated appraisal systems use regression based on property characteristics and weight predictions with recent comparable sales, then customized value estimates are provided, but computational cost increases when run on large datasets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomized value estimatesVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large dataset into smaller study groups based on property characteristics and geographic proximity. By dividing the computation into manageable chunks (study groups with 5-50 properties each), the system maintains customized valuation accuracy while reducing the computational burden of processing entire datasets at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-calculating property features, creating feature vectors, and organizing comparable sales data before the actual valuation computation. This preprocessing step includes standardizing property characteristics and establishing baseline regression models, which speeds up the final customized valuation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If human appraisers manually select comparable properties and apply judgment adjustments, then customized value estimates are provided, but the process is not automated and relies on subjective factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomized value estimatesVSAvoidmanual appraisal process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically selecting comparable properties and calculating value adjustments without human intervention. The automated selection process uses algorithmic criteria (geographic proximity, property feature similarity, recency of sale) to identify comparables, and the adjustment calculations are performed through standardized regression models, eliminating subjective appraiser judgment while maintaining customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual appraisal with an automated computational system. Instead of human appraisers physically examining properties and mentally calculating adjustments, the system uses computer algorithms to process property data, calculate feature distances, and generate valuation estimates, thereby automating the entire appraisal workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Extent of automation

If automated appraisal systems rely on prior assessments and jurisdictionally provided boundaries, then the process is automated, but accuracy depends on the accuracy of prior assessments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated appraisal processVSAvoiddependence on prior assessments
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes key parameters by using actual comparable sales data and property features as the foundation for valuation, rather than relying on prior assessments. It transforms the input parameters to include detailed property characteristics (square footage, lot size, age, condition) and uses these to calculate fresh valuation estimates through regression analysis, reducing dependence on potentially inaccurate prior assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If simple valuation models like dollars per square foot are used, then the process is simple, but it is computationally expensive when run on large datasets and lacks customization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimple valuation modelVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using different valuation approaches for different properties based on their characteristics. Instead of a uniform simple model, the system selects and applies appropriate regression models and comparable property selections tailored to each property's features (residential vs. commercial, property size, location), providing customization while maintaining computational efficiency through localized model selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7930254B1Property value estimation using feature distance from comparable sales
Publication Date: 2011.04.19 MAE FANNIE
  • US7930254B1 patent drawing
  • US7930254B1 patent drawing
  • US7930254B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Property value estimation employs a comparable sales technique that calculates a feature distance between a target property and corresponding comparable properties. Determining estimated values for properties includes performing a regression based upon property features for properties in a relatively large geographical area. A set of comparable properties from a section of the relatively large geographical area is identified, and a feature distance between each property from the set of comparable properties and a target property is calculated using information from the regression. The feature distance provides a quantified indication of the difference between each property from the set of comparable properties and the target property for the plurality of property features. An estimated value for the target property is then determined based upon a value of each of the comparable properties and adjustments based upon the calculated feature distances.