Proppant Placement Prediction via Asperity Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for hydraulic fracturing in oil and gas wells face challenges in accurately predicting proppant placement and fracture conductivity, leading to inefficient fluid flow and reduced hydrocarbon recovery.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the prediction of proppant placement based on wellsite data, generation of an asperity model, and determination of fracture conductivity, followed by the injection of a stimulation fluid with proppant into the formation to optimize fracture conductivity and fluid production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional hydraulic fracturing methods are used without predictive modeling, then the operation can be performed quickly and simply, but the accuracy of proppant placement and fracture conductivity prediction is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproppant placement accuracyVSAvoidmodeling and simulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing predictive modeling and simulation before the actual hydraulic fracturing operation. The system predicts proppant placement and fracture conductivity in advance using asperity models and multiple simulations, allowing operators to optimize the fracturing design before implementation. This pre-planning approach improves placement accuracy without adding significant operational complexity during the actual fracturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating virtual asperity models that replicate the complex fracture geometry and proppant distribution. Instead of directly measuring the actual fracture (which is inaccessible), the system creates a computational copy of the fracture geometry and uses this model to predict proppant placement and conductivity. This virtual copying approach enables accurate prediction without requiring complex physical measurement devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If proppant placement is not optimized, then the injection process is simpler and faster, but fluid flow through the fracture is inefficient and hydrocarbon recovery is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrocarbon recovery efficiencyVSAvoidproppant placement optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by using predictive simulation results to guide and optimize the actual proppant injection process. The system simulates different proppant placement scenarios, evaluates their impact on fracture conductivity and fluid flow, and uses this information to optimize the injection strategy. This feedback loop between simulation and actual operation improves hydrocarbon recovery by ensuring optimal proppant placement without requiring overly complex real-time monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by systematically varying proppant properties (such as size, shape, and distribution) in the simulation to predict their impact on fracture conductivity. The system evaluates different proppant parameters and selects the optimal combination that maximizes fluid flow and hydrocarbon recovery. This approach enables productivity improvement through parameter optimization without requiring complex physical modification of the injection equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If detailed asperity modeling is performed to predict proppant placement, then the precision of conductivity prediction is improved, but the computational time and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefracture conductivity prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses copying to create simplified asperity models that capture the essential fracture geometry without requiring complete detailed modeling. The system creates a representative copy of the fracture surface with key asperity features that are sufficient for predicting proppant placement and conductivity. This approach maintains prediction accuracy while significantly reducing computational complexity and processing time compared to exhaustive detailed modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by focusing detailed asperity modeling only in critical regions of the fracture where proppant placement has the greatest impact on conductivity. Instead of uniformly modeling the entire fracture with high detail, the system identifies and concentrates computational effort on key zones that control fluid flow. This selective approach improves prediction accuracy in critical areas while minimizing overall computational time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9677393B2Method for performing a stimulation operation with proppant placement at a wellsite
Publication Date: 2017.06.13 SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP
  • US9677393B2 patent drawing
  • US9677393B2 patent drawing
  • US9677393B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of performing a stimulation operation at a wellsite is provided. The wellsite has a wellbore penetrating a formation having fractures therein. The method involves predicting placement of proppant parameters in the fractures based on wellsite data, generating an asperity model based on the predicted placement, predicting aperture change for a prescribed closure stress using the asperity model, and determining fracture conductivity based on the predicted aperture change. The method also involves placing into the fractures with a stimulation fluid by injecting the stimulation fluid having the proppant therein into the formation based on the determined fracture conductivity and producing fluid from the reservoirs and into the wellbore through the propped fractures.