Proppant Placement Prediction via Asperity Modeling
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current methods for hydraulic fracturing in oil and gas wells face challenges in accurately predicting proppant placement and fracture conductivity, leading to inefficient fluid flow and reduced hydrocarbon recovery.
Innovation Solution
A method involving the prediction of proppant placement based on wellsite data, generation of an asperity model, and determination of fracture conductivity, followed by the injection of a stimulation fluid with proppant into the formation to optimize fracture conductivity and fluid production.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Measurement precision
If traditional hydraulic fracturing methods are used without predictive modeling, then the operation can be performed quickly and simply, but the accuracy of proppant placement and fracture conductivity prediction is poor
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by performing predictive modeling and simulation before the actual hydraulic fracturing operation. The system predicts proppant placement and fracture conductivity in advance using asperity models and multiple simulations, allowing operators to optimize the fracturing design before implementation. This pre-planning approach improves placement accuracy without adding significant operational complexity during the actual fracturing process.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses copying by creating virtual asperity models that replicate the complex fracture geometry and proppant distribution. Instead of directly measuring the actual fracture (which is inaccessible), the system creates a computational copy of the fracture geometry and uses this model to predict proppant placement and conductivity. This virtual copying approach enables accurate prediction without requiring complex physical measurement devices.
2Productivity
If proppant placement is not optimized, then the injection process is simpler and faster, but fluid flow through the fracture is inefficient and hydrocarbon recovery is reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies feedback by using predictive simulation results to guide and optimize the actual proppant injection process. The system simulates different proppant placement scenarios, evaluates their impact on fracture conductivity and fluid flow, and uses this information to optimize the injection strategy. This feedback loop between simulation and actual operation improves hydrocarbon recovery by ensuring optimal proppant placement without requiring overly complex real-time monitoring systems.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent uses parameter changes by systematically varying proppant properties (such as size, shape, and distribution) in the simulation to predict their impact on fracture conductivity. The system evaluates different proppant parameters and selects the optimal combination that maximizes fluid flow and hydrocarbon recovery. This approach enables productivity improvement through parameter optimization without requiring complex physical modification of the injection equipment.
3Measurement precision
If detailed asperity modeling is performed to predict proppant placement, then the precision of conductivity prediction is improved, but the computational time and processing requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent uses copying to create simplified asperity models that capture the essential fracture geometry without requiring complete detailed modeling. The system creates a representative copy of the fracture surface with key asperity features that are sufficient for predicting proppant placement and conductivity. This approach maintains prediction accuracy while significantly reducing computational complexity and processing time compared to exhaustive detailed modeling.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies local quality by focusing detailed asperity modeling only in critical regions of the fracture where proppant placement has the greatest impact on conductivity. Instead of uniformly modeling the entire fracture with high detail, the system identifies and concentrates computational effort on key zones that control fluid flow. This selective approach improves prediction accuracy in critical areas while minimizing overall computational time.
Data Source
AI summary
A method of performing a stimulation operation at a wellsite is provided. The wellsite has a wellbore penetrating a formation having fractures therein. The method involves predicting placement of proppant parameters in the fractures based on wellsite data, generating an asperity model based on the predicted placement, predicting aperture change for a prescribed closure stress using the asperity model, and determining fracture conductivity based on the predicted aperture change. The method also involves placing into the fractures with a stimulation fluid by injecting the stimulation fluid having the proppant therein into the formation based on the determined fracture conductivity and producing fluid from the reservoirs and into the wellbore through the propped fractures.


