Multimodal Deep Learning for Prostate Cancer Outcome Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for prognosticating patient outcomes in prostate cancer are non-specific and insensitive, leading to over- and under-treatment, and there is a need for accurate, globally scalable tools to personalize cancer therapy.

Innovation Solution

The use of a multimodal deep learning system that processes biological samples by combining image data from digital histopathology and tabular clinical data to classify cancer states and predict clinical outcomes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If non-specific and insensitive tools are used for prognostication, then the assessment process is simple, but the accuracy and reliability of cancer outcome prediction deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of cancer outcome predictionVSAvoidcomplexity of assessment system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the cancer assessment process into multiple specialized components: deep learning models for histopathology image analysis, separate models for clinical data processing, and integrated multimodal fusion layers. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in specific data types and features, improving overall prediction accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite assessment system that integrates multiple data sources (histopathology images, clinical data, genomic data) and multiple analysis methods (deep learning, traditional machine learning, statistical models) into a unified prognostic framework. This composite approach leverages the strengths of each component to achieve superior prediction accuracy compared to any single method alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If accurate and personalized cancer therapy assessment is implemented, then the effectiveness of therapy selection improves, but the complexity of data processing and analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of therapy selectionVSAvoidcomplexity of data processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary processing and feature extraction on histopathology images and clinical data before integration. Deep learning models pre-process images to extract relevant features, and clinical data undergoes preliminary cleaning and standardization. This preliminary action reduces the complexity of subsequent integration and analysis steps while improving the reliability of therapy selection by ensuring high-quality input data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary components including feature extraction layers, data fusion mechanisms, and interpretation modules that mediate between raw multi-modal data and final therapy recommendations. These intermediaries transform complex raw data into meaningful features and insights, reducing the burden on the final decision-making system while improving therapy selection reliability through systematic data integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If deep learning algorithms are used to process complex molecular and phenotypic data, then the precision of cancer assessment improves, but the computational resources and time required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of cancer assessmentVSAvoidcomputational time for data analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary data processing and feature extraction using deep learning models on histopathology images before integration with clinical data. This preliminary action extracts the most relevant features in advance, reducing the dimensionality and complexity of data requiring further processing. While initial processing requires computational resources, it significantly reduces the time needed for subsequent analysis and decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies deep learning algorithms selectively to the most informative and discriminative features of the data, rather than processing all data uniformly. The system identifies and focuses computational resources on key histopathological features and clinical parameters that have the highest predictive value, achieving high precision assessment while minimizing unnecessary computational time expenditure on less relevant data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250054624A1Methods and systems for digital pathology assessment of cancer via deep learning
Publication Date: 2025.02.13 ARTERA INC
  • US20250054624A1 patent drawing
  • US20250054624A1 patent drawing
  • US20250054624A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides methods and systems for classifying and/or monitoring a cancer of a subject. A method for assessing a cancer of a subject may comprise obtaining a data set comprising image and/or tabular data from the subject and processing the data with one or more trained algorithms to classify the cancer of the subject. The cancer of the subject may be assessed based on the results of the classification.