Patient-Specific Prostate Cancer Simulation via Reaction-Diffusion Modeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical practices for prostate cancer lack a comprehensive theoretical model to organize and understand the vast amount of data on the molecular, biological, and physiological mechanisms of tumor origin, growth, and spread, limiting effective simulation and prediction of disease progression.

Innovation Solution

A method involving coupled reaction-diffusion equations and patient-specific geometric models of the prostate gland, simulated using computer systems, to predict tumor evolution and progression, incorporating a phase field to represent cancerous cell extent and a nutrient field to model nutrient concentration, with additional equations for PSA dynamics to simulate serum PSA levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If current medical practices use statistics and heuristic indicators for cancer staging and treatment selection, then treatment protocols can be established, but the ability to simulate and predict individual patient progression is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The model segments the prostate gland into multiple zones (central zone, peripheral zone, transition zone) and divides tumor progression into distinct stages (in situ carcinoma, intraprostatic extension, extraprostatic extension). This segmentation allows the complex biological processes to be modeled through simpler, manageable components, enabling accurate predictions while maintaining computational feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional statistical probabilities to three-dimensional spatial modeling of tumor growth within the prostate anatomy. By incorporating spatial coordinates and 3D geometric constraints, the model achieves more precise prediction of tumor progression while the computational algorithms are optimized to manage the increased dimensionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a comprehensive theoretical model is developed to organize molecular, biological, and physiological data, then simulation capability improves, but the complexity of the model increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel versatilityVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The model is designed to be universally applicable across different patient populations and tumor types by incorporating general biological principles (cell proliferation, differentiation, angiogenesis, metastasis) that can be parameterized for specific cases. This multi-functionality allows the same framework to handle various scenarios without requiring completely separate models for each application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The model uses parameterized equations where key biological parameters (growth rates, diffusion coefficients, angiogenesis rates) can be adjusted based on patient-specific data, tumor stage, and molecular characteristics. This parameterization approach allows the comprehensive model to adapt to different scenarios while maintaining a unified mathematical framework, balancing versatility with manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If patient-specific geometric models and reaction-diffusion equations are used to simulate tumor evolution, then prediction accuracy improves, but computational requirements and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The model performs preliminary computations to establish baseline parameters and geometric models before simulating tumor progression. By pre-processing patient anatomy data and establishing initial conditions, the system reduces the computational burden during the actual simulation phase, improving reliability while managing computational complexity through staged calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The model dynamically adjusts computational parameters and simulation resolution based on the tumor growth stage and patient-specific characteristics. The reaction-diffusion equations are solved with adaptive time steps and spatial resolution, concentrating computational resources where needed most while using coarser grids where possible, thereby achieving reliable predictions with optimized computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20230274842A1Tissue-scale, patient-specific modeling and simulation of prostate cancer growth
Publication Date: 2023.08.31 PURDUE RES FOUND
  • US20230274842A1 patent drawing
  • US20230274842A1 patent drawing
  • US20230274842A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for simulation of the evolution of a tumor in a prostate gland of a subject are disclosed. The techniques may be based on implementation of a coupled system of reaction-diffusion equations and a patient-specific geometric model of the prostate gland of the subject. The use of reaction-diffusion equations and a patient-specific geometric model provides a tumor model that predicts the expected progression of prostate cancer in the subject. The tumor model may be used to devise a customized treatment for the subject.