Prosthesis Anchoring System with Press-Fit and Anti-Rotation Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current anchoring systems for prostheses lack sufficient mechanical strength and stability, leading to potential damage from moderate overload forces and mechanical stresses, which can result in the loosening of surgically implanted parts and the need for additional surgical operations.

Innovation Solution

The anchoring system incorporates an outer threaded profile with varying thread depths and a press-fit connection with anti-rotation geometry and conical portions to enhance bone anchoring, stability, and load distribution, featuring a press-fit connection with a conical portion for secure attachment and a polygon cross-section for anti-rotation, along with surface treatments for wear resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the anchoring element is designed with a through-hole for communication pathways, then bidirectional communication with the human body is enabled, but the mechanical strength of the anchoring element is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication capabilityVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The anchoring element features non-uniform wall thickness with thicker sections at critical stress points (distal end and thread roots) and thinner sections where communication pathways are needed. This local variation in quality allows the structure to maintain mechanical strength where required while enabling communication functionality where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The anchoring element combines different material properties through surface treatments (anodization, coating layers) and structural composite design (threaded sections combined with smooth sections, varying wall thicknesses) to achieve both mechanical strength and communication functionality simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Device complexity

If the anchoring system uses a simple connection between anchoring element and abutment, then the device complexity is reduced, but the mechanical strength and stability under overload forces are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection structureVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The connection structure is divided into multiple functional segments: a press-fit connection zone with interference fit, a threaded engagement zone for the abutment screw, and a distal portion with specific geometry. This segmentation allows each zone to handle specific mechanical loads, providing overall strength without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The anchoring element incorporates rounded transitions, fillets at thread roots, and curved surface profiles to eliminate stress concentration points. The smooth curved transitions between different sections distribute mechanical stresses more evenly, enhancing overall mechanical strength without adding complex features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Ease of manufacture

If the anchoring element has uniform wall thickness, then the manufacturing process is simplified, but the mechanical strength under bending and rotational forces is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing processVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The anchoring element features non-uniform wall thickness with thicker sections at critical stress points (distal end and thread roots) and thinner sections where communication pathways are needed. This local variation in quality allows the structure to maintain mechanical strength where required while enabling communication functionality where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If the anchoring system uses standard threaded profile, then the ease of manufacture is improved, but the anti-rotation capability and stability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreaded profileVSAvoidanti-rotation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The anchoring element incorporates asymmetric features including a polygonal cross-section in the distal portion and non-circular anti-rotation geometries (flat spots, ridges, or keyed features) that prevent rotational movement of the abutment. These asymmetric features provide superior anti-rotation capability while remaining manufacturable using standard processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS11464606B2Anchoring system for attaching a prosthesis to a human body
Publication Date: 2022.10.11 INTEGRUM
  • US11464606B2 patent drawing
  • US11464606B2 patent drawing
  • US11464606B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to an anchoring system for attaching a prosthesis to a human body, comprising: an anchoring element, an abutment, an abutment screw for attaching the abutment to the anchoring element, the anchoring element comprises a connection area for the abutment, the connection area comprising a press-fit portion such that the abutment is attached to the anchoring element in the connection area by a press-fit connection, wherein the connection area comprises an anti-rotation geometry and the abutment comprising a corresponding mating anti-rotation geometry proximal to the press-fit portion, and where in the connection area comprises a conical portion proximal to the anti-rotational geometry forming a mating geometry for a corresponding conical portion in the through-hole of the abutment.