Prosthesis Stance Controller for Adaptive Torque

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robotic prostheses face challenges in providing biologically accurate torque across a wide range of walking speeds and ground inclinations, requiring speed-specific tuning and failing to adapt to individual gait cadences, leading to inefficient gait and increased stress on the musculoskeletal system for users with transfemoral amputations.

Innovation Solution

A control framework that enforces quasi-stiffness profiles in the stance phase and employs a minimum-jerk trajectory generator for the swing phase, allowing the prosthesis to generate biologically accurate kinetics and kinematics without the need for user- or speed-specific tuning, using a combination of biomechanical data interpolation and sensor feedback to adjust joint torques based on walking speed and ground inclination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If impedance-inspired control with speed-specific parameter tuning is used, then biologically accurate torque can be provided at a specific walking speed, but the prosthesis function becomes incorrect at other speeds and requires user-specific tuning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque accuracyVSAvoidadaptability to different walking speeds
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts impedance parameters based on detected walking speed and gait phase. The stiffness, damping, and equilibrium values are continuously modified according to real-time speed information, allowing the prosthesis to maintain biologically accurate torque across varying speeds without manual retuning for each speed condition

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes control parameters (stiffness, damping, equilibrium) as functions of walking speed and gait phase. By parameterizing the impedance model with speed-dependent values, the prosthesis adapts its torque output to match biological characteristics at different speeds while maintaining a unified control framework that eliminates the need for separate speed-specific tuning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If impedance-inspired control with user-specific tuning is used, then optimal prosthesis function can be achieved for a specific user at a specific speed, but the system becomes infeasible for clinical practice due to tuning complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprosthesis function optimalityVSAvoidtuning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system automatically adapts to each user's gait characteristics and walking speed without requiring manual tuning. By using speed detection and automated parameter adjustment, the prosthesis self-calibrates to match the user's biological characteristics, eliminating the need for clinician or user involvement in the tuning process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback from speed sensors and gait phase detection to continuously adjust impedance parameters. This closed-loop control allows the prosthesis to automatically adapt to varying user conditions and walking speeds, maintaining optimal function without requiring manual intervention or user-specific programming

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If passive prostheses are used, then device simplicity is maintained, but they cannot provide biologically accurate torque and require increased compensatory effort from the user

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprosthesis simplicityVSAvoidmetabolic effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces passive mechanical compliance with active electronic control. Instead of relying on fixed mechanical properties, the prosthesis uses motor actuators controlled by impedance-based algorithms that dynamically adjust torque output, enabling biologically accurate force generation that reduces user compensatory effort and metabolic cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10799373B2Stance controller and related methods
Publication Date: 2020.10.13 REHABILITATION INSTION OF CHICAGO
  • US10799373B2 patent drawing
  • US10799373B2 patent drawing
  • US10799373B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for operating a joint of a prosthesis during a phase of stance. In an embodiment, a method for such operation comprises determining a joint angle of the joint, determining a walking speed of the prosthesis, retrieving a torque value from a lookup table stored in a memory, on the basis of the joint angle and the walking speed, and initiating a signal to apply a torque to the joint of the prosthesis in an amount based on the torque value.