3D Printing Prosthetic Code Database

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

It is economically challenging for companies and consumers to store, produce, and procure anatomically designed prosthetics and prosthetic enhancements in a timely manner, as existing methods lack efficiency and convenience.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a code on a device that can be interpreted to identify a 3D design specification for printing a replacement on a 3D printer, where the code is read by a scanning device and transmitted to a processor, which then directs a 3D printer to produce the new prosthetic, allowing for remote and efficient production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional methods are used to store and produce prosthetics, then companies can maintain inventory, but it becomes economically challenging and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidprocurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-storing 3D design specifications in a database before actual production is needed. When a prosthetic replacement is required, the system retrieves the pre-stored design data and transmits it to a 3D printer, eliminating the need for time-consuming design processes during procurement. This allows for rapid production while maintaining inventory efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If anatomically designed prosthetics are produced using traditional methods, then customization is achieved, but storage and production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidinventory storage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies copying by creating and storing digital 3D design specifications as virtual copies of prosthetics in a database. Instead of physically storing multiple customized prosthetics in inventory, the system stores their digital representations and only produces physical units when needed. This maintains full customization capability while dramatically reducing storage requirements and inventory costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Loss of time

If replacement prosthetics are produced on-demand, then procurement time is reduced, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocurement cycle timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the intermediary principle by introducing a centralized database as a mediator between the order receipt and 3D printing processes. The database stores pre-prepared 3D design specifications and acts as an intermediary that receives order information, retrieves appropriate design data, validates it, and transmits it to the 3D printer. This simplifies the overall system architecture by centralizing complexity in a manageable database rather than requiring complex real-time processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9436925B2Inventory management
Publication Date: 2016.09.06 COMBS JAMES ANDREW
  • US9436925B2 patent drawing
  • US9436925B2 patent drawing
  • US9436925B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device includes a code that is interpretable to identify a three-dimensional (3D) design specification by which a replacement for the device can be printed on a 3D printer.