Prosthetic Extractor Hook Mechanism for Minimizing Bone Damage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for removing failed orthopedic prosthetics from bones are invasive, require excessive surgical dissection, and often fail to generate sufficient force to break the bond between the implant and bone, leading to longer operative times, tissue damage, and prolonged recovery for patients.

Innovation Solution

A prosthetic implant extraction device with an elongated member and a hook mechanism that includes a channel to engage the surgical implant, allowing for efficient transmission of kinetic energy to disrupt the implant/bone interface, facilitating less invasive surgical techniques and minimizing tissue and bone damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional extraction tools are used, then the implant can be removed, but the surgical dissection is enlarged and operative time is extended

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperative timeVSAvoidtissue damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The extraction device is divided into multiple functional segments: a handle portion for manual operation, a shaft for force transmission, and a specialized extraction tip with varying geometries (e.g., curved blades, hooks, or countersinking surfaces) tailored to different implant types. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function while reducing overall tissue damage and operative time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of attempting to extract the implant through the original insertion site with minimal disruption, the device approaches the implant from the opposite direction or uses a reversed extraction mechanism. For example, the extraction tip may have a curved blade that countersinks into the implant from the distal end, or a hook that engages from the proximal end, effectively inverting the traditional extraction approach to reduce soft tissue damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Force

If current extraction techniques are used, then the implant can be removed, but excessive force is required breaking the implant/bone bond

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce to break implant/bone bondVSAvoidbone damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The extraction tip incorporates locally optimized features such as countersinking surfaces with specific angles, curved blades positioned at precise locations, or reinforced hooks at critical engagement points. These localized quality enhancements concentrate the extraction force at optimal points on the implant-bone interface, reducing the overall force required and minimizing damage to surrounding bone and soft tissue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The extraction device incorporates curved or spherical surfaces in its tip design, such as a countersinking blade with a rounded leading edge or a curved extraction surface that matches the contour of the implant. This curvature allows for smoother force application and better engagement with the implant geometry, reducing peak stresses and preventing bone damage while maintaining sufficient extraction force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Ease of operation

If osteotomy is performed to facilitate removal, then the implant can be removed, but the procedure becomes more invasive and recovery time is prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implant removalVSAvoidinvasiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The extraction device acts as an intermediary tool that bridges the gap between the surgeon and the implanted component. The specialized extraction tip engages with the implant through existing access points or minimal incisions, providing mechanical leverage and force transmission without requiring osteotomy. This intermediary mechanism allows for implant removal through less invasive means, preserving bone stock and reducing soft tissue damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The device replaces the need for osteotomy (bone cutting) with a mechanical extraction system. The extraction tip uses controlled mechanical forces applied through a shaft and handle mechanism to disengage the implant from bone without requiring bone removal. This substitution of mechanical extraction for surgical bone cutting reduces invasiveness and eliminates the need for subsequent osteotomy healing periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device enables efficient and less invasive removal of orthopedic implants with minimal physical effort and tissue damage, optimizing revision joint replacement procedures by effectively breaking the implant/bone bond, thus reducing recovery time and complications.

Implementation Method 1

A prosthetic implant extraction device with an elongated member and a hook mechanism that includes a channel to engage the surgical implant, allowing for efficient transmission of kinetic energy to disrupt the implant/bone interface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectKinetic energy transmission: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS20220401230A1Prosthetic component extractor
Publication Date: 2022.12.22 ALDEN KRIS
  • US20220401230A1 patent drawing
  • US20220401230A1 patent drawing
  • US20220401230A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A medical device, comprises an elongated member having a first end portion and a second end portion opposite the first end portion. A handle is coupled to the elongated member at the first end portion and defines a first striking surface. A second striking surface is coupled to the elongated member between the first end and the second end as a protrusion extending away from the elongated member. A hook is coupled to the second end portion and defines a channel sized and configured to receive at least a portion of a surgical implant.