Hinge Joint System with Overrunning Clutch for Prosthetic Gait

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current prosthetic and orthotic devices with hinge joint systems face challenges in providing smooth, continuous movement without backlash and efficient energy management, particularly in propulsive bionic types, leading to user fatigue and inadequate adaptation to varying walking conditions.

Innovation Solution

A prosthetic or orthotic device with a movement controlling mechanism (MCM) that includes biasing means to allow torque or force transmission in one direction while allowing free movement in the opposite direction, using an overrunning clutch assembly and resetting means to ensure seamless operation and energy efficiency, mimicking natural gait and adapting to different slopes and speeds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a movement controlling mechanism is used to control rotational movement between members, then the adaptability to different walking conditions is improved, but backlash and discontinuous movement occur reducing operational smoothness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different walking conditionsVSAvoidoperational smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces intermediate elements (such as springs or dampers) between the first and second members to mediate the rotational movement. These intermediate elements absorb shocks, eliminate backlash, and ensure continuous movement while allowing the mechanism to adapt to different walking conditions smoothly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The movement controlling mechanism dynamically adjusts parameters such as stiffness, damping, or clearance based on the operational state. This allows the system to maintain smooth operation across different walking conditions by changing mechanical parameters in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If heavy actuators are used to provide necessary power for propulsion, then the power output is improved, but the device weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower output for propulsionVSAvoiddevice weight
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic mechanisms that store and release energy during the gait cycle. Energy-storing elements like springs capture work during the swing phase and release it during stance phase, reducing the need for heavy continuous actuators while maintaining necessary power output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system recovers energy from the gait cycle by capturing work during certain phases (swing) and storing it for use during other phases (stance). This energy recovery reduces the net power requirement, allowing lighter actuators compared to systems that continuously generate power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Loss of energy

If passive energy-storing-and-returning prosthetic feet are used, then the energy efficiency is improved, but the adaptability to different walking slopes and surfaces is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidadaptability to different walking slopes and surfaces
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates dynamic adjustment mechanisms that automatically adapt the energy-storing characteristics to match different walking conditions. The system maintains energy efficiency by storing and returning energy while adapting to varying slopes and surfaces through real-time mechanical adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables a smooth, continuous, and energy-efficient operation of the prosthetic or orthotic device, reducing user fatigue and enhancing adaptability to various walking conditions by effectively managing energy and eliminating backlash, thus providing a more natural gait experience.

Implementation Method 1

biasing means which act on the first or second MCM part and which, in a contacting mode of operation of the MCM, bias the intermediate elements against the other of the first and second MCM part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBiasing force: Spring

Implementation Method 2

the MCM is such that, in a contacting mode, on the one hand, when a relative torque or force is applied between the first and second member in a blocking sense the one or more intermediate elements allows or allow transmission of torque or force between the first and second MCM parts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10709583B2Prosthesis or orthosis comprising a hinge joint system for functionally assisting, enhancing and/or replacing a hinge joint of a human or animal subject
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 VRIJE UNIV BRUSSEL
  • US10709583B2 patent drawing
  • US10709583B2 patent drawing
  • US10709583B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A prosthesis or orthosis having a movement controlling mechanism (MCM) including a first MCM part, a second MCM part and one or more intermediate elements and biasing mechanism which, in a contacting mode of operation of the MCM, bias the intermediate elements against a MCM part. When a relative torque or force is applied in a blocking sense (U) transmission of torque is allowed and, on the other hand, when a torque or force is applied in the opposite sense (V) non-blocking relative movement is allowed.