Warp-Knit Prosthetic Porous Structure for Strength and Tissue Ingrowth

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lightweight porous knits for abdominal wall reinforcement exhibit poor mechanical strength, leading to potential fracture, shear force imbalances, and discomfort due to high intra-abdominal pressure, which can result in hernia repair recurrences and patient pain.

Innovation Solution

A prosthetic porous knit with a specific knitting pattern on a warp knitting machine using biocompatible polymer monofilaments, featuring a lightweight and macroporous structure with uniform shear force distribution, ensuring good visibility and tissue ingrowth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If lightweight porous knits are used for abdominal wall reinforcement, then the prosthesis conforms to the abdominal wall and facilitates tissue ingrowth, but the mechanical strength is poor and resistance to fracture is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of prosthesisVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines polyester monofilaments (providing mechanical strength) with polypropylene monofilaments (providing porosity and flexibility) in a single knit structure. This composite approach allows the prosthesis to simultaneously achieve lightweight properties, macroporous structure for tissue ingrowth, and sufficient mechanical strength to resist fracture during suturing and under intra-abdominal pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Adaptability or versatility

If the knit is made pliant and soft to conform to the abdominal wall, then flexibility and tissue conformity are improved, but resistance to fracture during suturing deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconformity to abdominal wallVSAvoidresistance to fracture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates different mechanical properties in different regions of the knit structure by using alternating rows of different monofilament types. The polyester rows provide strength and stiffness for fracture resistance, while the polypropylene rows provide flexibility and porosity for tissue conformity. This local differentiation allows the single prosthesis to simultaneously exhibit both pliancy for conformity and strength for fracture resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If high porosity is achieved to facilitate tissue ingrowth, then tissue integration is improved, but mechanical strength and structural integrity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue ingrowthVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates polypropylene monofilaments which inherently create a macroporous structure with high porosity that facilitates tissue ingrowth. However, to compensate for the mechanical weakness of highly porous structures, the patent combines these with polyester monofilaments that provide the necessary structural integrity and mechanical strength, creating a composite knit that maintains both high porosity and sufficient strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

4Ease of manufacture

If the knit structure is simplified to reduce manufacturing complexity, then ease of manufacture is improved, but uniformity of shear force distribution deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing complexityVSAvoiduniformity of shear force distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a periodic knitting pattern where rows of polyester monofilaments and rows of polypropylene monofilaments alternate in a regular sequence. This periodic structure, defined by specific guide bar patterns on the warp knitting machine, ensures uniform distribution of mechanical properties throughout the prosthesis, resulting in homogeneous shear force distribution at fixation points while maintaining relatively simple manufacturing through standardized machine operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12392064B2Prosthetic porous knit
Publication Date: 2025.08.19 SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS
  • US12392064B2 patent drawing
  • US12392064B2 patent drawing
  • US12392064B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a prosthetic porous knit based on a monofilament of a biocompatible polymer material, the pattern followed for the knitting of said monofilament on a warp knitting machine having two guide bars B1, B2 being the following, according to the ISO 11676 standard:Bar B1: 1.2/4.5/4.3/4.5/4.3/1.0/1.2/1.0//Bar B2: 4.3/1.0/1.2/1.0/1.2/4.5/4.3/4.5//The invention further relates to a method for producing such a knit and to a hernia prosthesis comprising such a knit.