Protected Zone Segmentation for Multi-Unit Monitoring Setup

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Setting up a protected zone monitored by multiple monitoring units is time-consuming and costly, as each part region must be individually configured and adapted across multiple units, requiring physical access and numerous iterations.

Innovation Solution

A method that detects the positions and maximum detection zones of monitoring units, fixes the desired protected zone in a graphical user interface, and assigns part regions automatically to each unit, allowing for fully automatic configuration and reducing manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If multiple monitoring units are used to cover a large protected zone, then the coverage area is improved, but the configuration time and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotected zone coverage areaVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The protected zone is divided into multiple part regions, each assigned to a specific monitoring unit. The system automatically segments the overall protected zone based on the positions and detection zones of multiple monitoring units, eliminating the need for manual configuration of each region while maintaining comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A central evaluation unit acts as an intermediary that receives position information from multiple monitoring units, calculates the optimal part region assignments, and transmits the configuration data back to the monitoring units. This automated intermediary process replaces manual configuration efforts and significantly reduces setup time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple monitoring units are configured individually, then complete coverage is achieved, but the number of manual adjustments and iterations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage completenessVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The configuration process merges the setup of multiple monitoring units into a single automated operation. Instead of individually configuring each unit, the system combines all position data and detection zone information, then generates a unified configuration that ensures complete coverage without gaps or unnecessary overlaps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system evaluates the detected positions and detection zones of monitoring units, automatically adjusts part region assignments to eliminate gaps and overlaps, and iterates this process until optimal coverage is achieved. This automated feedback loop replaces multiple manual adjustment iterations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If physical access to each monitoring unit is required for configuration, then direct control is possible, but the setup process becomes more costly and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect control capabilityVSAvoidsetup efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical approach of physically accessing each monitoring unit with an automated data transmission system. Position information is transmitted electronically to a central evaluation unit, which calculates configurations and sends control data back through the same electronic channels, eliminating the need for physical access while maintaining full control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring units and central evaluation unit work together in an automated self-service configuration process. The system automatically detects positions, evaluates coverage requirements, determines optimal part region assignments, and configures each unit without requiring manual intervention or physical access, thereby dramatically improving setup efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11333790B2Method of setting a plurality of part regions of a desired protected zone
Publication Date: 2022.05.17 SICK AG
  • US11333790B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method of setting a plurality of part regions of a desired protected zone, in whicha) the positions of a plurality of monitoring units are detected, with each monitoring unit detecting a detection zone;b) a maximum size of each detection zone is determined;c) the desired protected zone is fixed in a graphical user interface;d) the part regions to be monitored by the respective monitoring units are fixed with reference to the positions of the monitoring units, to the maximum size of the detection zones and of the desired protected zone; ande) the part regions are assigned to the respective monitoring units.