Protection from hard commutation events at power switches

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

MOSFETs in power circuits are vulnerable to hard commutation events, which can cause damage due to reverse recovery behavior, and existing solutions like snubber circuitry or superjunction structures either increase complexity, cost, or reduce efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a power circuit with a passive or active protection scheme that uses high-ohmic and low-ohmic outputs of a driver to protect MOSFETs from hard commutation events, either predictively or non-predictively, by managing the gate terminal impedance to prevent voltage overshoots and ensure efficient switching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional protection methods like snubber circuitry or superjunction structures are used, then MOSFET protection from hard commutation events is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMOSFET protection from hard commutation eventsVSAvoidcircuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the protection function from complex external circuitry (snubbers) and integrates it into the driver's output impedance control. By taking out the unnecessary complexity of external protection circuits and embedding the protection mechanism within the driver itself, the solution achieves MOSFET protection while reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The driver's output impedance acts as an intermediary between the control signal and the MOSFET gate. By dynamically adjusting this intermediary's impedance (high during voltage blocking, low during current conduction), the system protects the MOSFET from hard commutation events without requiring complex external circuitry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If high-ohmic output is activated during the entire switching cycle for protection, then MOSFET protection is improved, but switching efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMOSFET protection from hard commutation eventsVSAvoidswitching efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by switching the driver's output impedance between high-ohmic and low-ohmic states according to the switching cycle phases. The high-ohmic state is activated periodically during voltage blocking phases for protection, while the low-ohmic state is activated during current conduction phases for efficiency, creating a rhythmic protection pattern that maintains both reliability and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The driver's output impedance is made dynamic rather than static. It automatically adjusts between high-ohmic and low-ohmic states based on the real-time operating conditions of the MOSFET. This dynamic adaptation ensures protection is applied only when needed (during voltage blocking), while maintaining optimal efficiency during current conduction, thus resolving the contradiction between protection and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If passive protection scheme is used, then implementation simplicity is improved, but protection effectiveness may be insufficient compared to active prediction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidprotection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The passive protection scheme enables the driver to automatically adjust its output impedance based on the inherent feedback from the circuit's operating state. The system serves itself by detecting conditions (through voltage and current sensing) and autonomously switching between high-ohmic and low-ohmic states, providing effective protection without requiring complex external control circuits or active prediction algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9780636B2Protection from hard commutation events at power switches
Publication Date: 2017.10.03 INFINEON TECH AUSTRIA AG
  • US9780636B2 patent drawing
  • US9780636B2 patent drawing
  • US9780636B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system is described that includes a half-bridge, a first driver, a second driver, and a controller unit. The half-bridge includes a first switch coupled to a second switch at a switching node. The first driver is configured to drive the first switch and the second driver is configured to drive the second switch. The controller unit is configured to determine whether a hard commutation event is likely to occur at the half-bridge during a future switching cycle, and responsive to determining that the hard commutation event is likely to occur during the future switching cycle, control the first driver and the second driver to activate at least one hard commutation countermeasure.