Protective Contact Socket With Spring-Loaded Locking Element

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional safety sockets are costly to manufacture and assemble, and require manual effort to secure the cover against the spring force during screwing, lacking efficient locking mechanisms for easy installation and child safety features.

Innovation Solution

A protective contact socket design featuring a spring-loaded locking element with an actuating ramp, allowing the cover to be locked in place using a screwdriver, and separate displaceable projections for easy assembly and child safety protection against accidental contact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a spring-loaded cover is used to close the socket housing, then the socket is protected from dirt and accidental contact, but the cover requires manual force to hold against spring pressure during assembly and installation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from dirt and accidental contactVSAvoidmanual force required during assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking element automatically engages with the locking position when the cover is inserted, eliminating the need for manual holding against spring force. The system serves itself by using the insertion motion to trigger the locking mechanism, which then maintains the cover in the closed position without continuous external force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The locking element acts as an intermediary between the cover and the socket housing, transferring the insertion force into a lateral locking action. This mediator component enables the cover to be secured without requiring the installer to continuously counteract the spring force during screwing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Shape

If the cover is designed to be flush with the leading edge of the socket housing, then aesthetics are improved, but the socket housing becomes more vulnerable to dirt accumulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaesthetic appearanceVSAvoiddirt accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cover transitions from a static flush design to a dynamic system that can move between flush and retracted positions. When retracted, the cover exposes an overhang that prevents dirt accumulation while maintaining aesthetic appearance when in the flush closed position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The position parameter of the cover is changed from fixed to variable, allowing it to switch between flush (aesthetic) and retracted (protective) states. This parameter change enables the system to satisfy both aesthetic requirements and protection requirements at different times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple components are used for the locking mechanism, then the locking function is more reliable, but the manufacturing and assembly costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking function reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing and assembly cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The locking element combines multiple functions into a single component: it acts as both a spring-loaded actuator and a lateral locking element. By merging these functions, the design reduces the number of separate parts needed while maintaining reliable locking functionality, thereby lowering manufacturing and assembly costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The locking element serves multiple purposes: providing spring force, guiding the cover insertion, and creating the lateral locking engagement. This multi-functional design eliminates the need for separate components for each function, reducing overall system complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design reduces manufacturing and assembly costs, simplifies installation by eliminating manual force against the spring, and provides effective child safety by automatically locking the cover when a plug is inserted or removed.

Implementation Method 1

a spring element (48), arranged to push the cover (40) in the insertion direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the cover (40) is pushed back into its initial position by the spring (48)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 3

the locking element (70) has an actuating ramp (90) in the area of the mounting opening (42) which causes the locking element (70) to move when the screwdriver is pressed onto the actuating ramp (90)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical advantage through inclined plane: Inclined Plane

Data Source

PatentEP3916927B1Protective contact socket
Publication Date: 2023.07.05 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC IND SAS
  • EP3916927B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4
  • EP3916927B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6
  • EP3916927B1 patent drawingFigure 7~8

AI summary

A grounded socket outlet consists of a base and a socket housing into which a cover can be inserted. A locking element is provided to secure the cover.