Protective Laminate Structures for Impact Energy Dispersion

Solution Overview

Problem

Current athletic helmets are bulky, rigid, and heavy, failing to effectively prevent concussions and rotational impacts, and are not well-suited for long-term use due to their complex manufacturing and limited impact absorption capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A protective laminate structure comprising an open fibrous lattice with loose fiber bundles or tubular elements, a continuous flexible layer, and high-elongation adhesives, which disperses energy and reduces impact forces through deformation, allowing for lighter, safer helmets that can absorb multiple impacts without damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional rigid shell structures are used in helmets, then skull fracture protection is achieved, but the helmets become bulky, heavy, and fail to prevent concussions and rotational impacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a flexible laminate structure composed of multiple layers including flexible adhesives, foam layers, and fibrous lattices. This flexible shell approach replaces the traditional rigid helmet shell, providing skull fracture protection through the distributed laminate structure while significantly reducing weight and enabling concussion and rotational impact prevention through controlled deformation and energy absorption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes composite materials by combining multiple layers with different properties: flexible adhesives (e.g., polyurethane), foam layers (e.g., viscoelastic foam), and fibrous lattice structures (e.g., carbon fiber, aramid fiber). This composite laminate structure achieves both strength for skull fracture protection and flexibility for concussion prevention, while the composite nature allows weight reduction compared to traditional monolithic rigid shells.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If traditional rigid helmets are designed with ribs and energy-absorption features, then impact protection is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases and the helmets can take only one impact before replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the helmet structure into multiple discrete laminate layers including flexible adhesives, foam layers, and fibrous lattice structures. This segmentation allows each layer to independently absorb and dissipate impact energy through controlled deformation, enabling the helmet to withstand multiple impacts without damage. The modular laminate structure simplifies manufacturing compared to complex ribbed designs while maintaining superior impact protection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Stability of the object's composition

If traditional rigid helmets are used, then structural integrity is maintained, but whiplash effect increases and rotational impacts are not prevented

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic laminate structure that can deform and adapt during impact events. The flexible adhesives and foam layers allow controlled movement and energy absorption, enabling the helmet to mitigate rotational impacts and reduce whiplash effects. The fibrous lattice structures provide dynamic reinforcement that maintains structural integrity during normal use while allowing necessary deformation during impacts to protect against concussions and rotational forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The laminate structure reduces whiplash risk, provides effective protection against concussions and rotational impacts, and extends the helmet's useful life by distributing and absorbing impact forces, making it safer and more durable than conventional helmets.

Implementation Method 1

a flexible adhesion means such as high-elongation adhesives connecting the continuous flexible layer and the lattice elements of the open fibrous lattice. The flexible adhesion means can include a high-elongation adhesive, which can be useful to absorb energy.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption through deformation: Deformation

Implementation Method 2

an open fibrous lattice (or network) comprising lattice elements defining an open (or void) area (or volume) between the lattice elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce distribution:

Implementation Method 3

a continuous flexible layer adjacent to the open fibrous lattice

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy absorption through deformation: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS20240081461A1Protective laminate structures and related articles
Publication Date: 2024.03.14
  • US20240081461A1 patent drawing
  • US20240081461A1 patent drawing
  • US20240081461A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure relates to a protective laminate structure that can be incorporated into a protective garment such as a sports helmet. The protective laminate structure includes lattice elements such as fiber bundles defining an open area between the lattice elements, a continuous flexible layer adjacent to the open fibrous lattice, and a flexible adhesion means such as high-elongation adhesives connecting the continuous flexible layer and the lattice elements of the open fibrous lattice. The protective laminate structures provide a structure in which energy from an impact is transferred/dispersed within the structure to limit and reduce both concussive and destructive/fracturing forces transmitted through the structure. Corresponding protective garments such as helmets are lighter yet safer relative to convention rigid-shell helmets, flexible yet prevent skull fracture, and small/conform closely to the head without transfer of impact forces.