Protective Apparatus Lattice Shell and Ventilated Foam

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional protective apparatuses, such as shin guards, face challenges in effectively distributing and dissipating impact forces across a larger area while maintaining resistance to punctures and impalements, with existing designs often lacking optimal material distribution and ventilation.

Innovation Solution

A protective apparatus comprising an impact shell with a lattice structure and an impact attenuating component featuring channels on its posterior side, which includes a series of grooves or channels to enhance force distribution and ventilation, coupled with a resilient material like styrene-butadiene copolymer for improved impact resistance and visibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If conventional protective apparatuses use solid foam padding without channels, then impact force distribution is limited, but ventilation is insufficient and weight is higher

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact force distributionVSAvoidventilation
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The impact attenuating component incorporates a series of channels extending through the foam padding material, creating a porous structure that allows air flow for ventilation while maintaining impact attenuation capabilities. The channels provide pathways for air circulation without significantly compromising the force distribution function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The foam padding is segmented by dividing it with channels into multiple sections. This segmentation creates both ventilation pathways and structural zones that can independently manage impact forces, improving overall force distribution while enabling thermal management through air flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If more material is used to improve impact resistance, then protection performance increases, but device weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistanceVSAvoidprotective apparatus weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The protective apparatus uses an impact shell with a lattice structure that provides varying material density and strength in different locations. The lattice pattern concentrates material where impact forces are most likely to occur while reducing material in areas with lower impact risk, optimizing protection performance while minimizing weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The apparatus combines multiple materials with different properties: a rigid impact shell material for external protection, foam padding for impact attenuation, and potentially different foam densities in different zones. This composite approach allows each material to contribute its optimal properties, achieving high impact resistance with reduced overall weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If the impact shell uses a rigid puncture-resistant material, then resistance to punctures and impalements improves, but impact force distribution capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to punctures and impalementsVSAvoidimpact force distribution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The impact shell is designed with a lattice structure that provides puncture resistance while maintaining flexibility. The lattice pattern allows the shell to deform and conform to impact forces rather than rigidly resisting them, enabling effective force distribution to the foam padding while maintaining puncture protection through the rigid lattice framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The described design effectively distributes impact forces across a larger area, provides enhanced resistance to punctures and impalements, and improves ventilation, resulting in improved comfort and protection by aligning channels with the lattice ribs to concentrate force absorption and reduce material weight.

Implementation Method 1

A protective apparatus is traditionally used to limit an impact force experienced by a person or an object. A protective apparatus dissipates and attenuates an impact force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact Force: Impact Force

Implementation Method 2

an impact attenuating structure, such as foam padding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelasticity: Viscoelasticity

Implementation Method 3

the impact attenuation component includes a series of channels or grooves on a posterior side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS10709179B2Protective apparatus having an impact attenuation component
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 NIKE INC
  • US10709179B2 patent drawing
  • US10709179B2 patent drawing
  • US10709179B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present invention relate to a protective apparatus that includes an impact shell and an impact attenuating component, which is less rigid than the impact shell. The impact attenuation component may include a series of channels or grooves on a posterior side, facing away from the impact shell.