Protein Detection via Filtered Nanopore Pulse Waveform Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional protein detection and quantification methods, such as ELISA and pore electrical resistance, struggle with noise signals from contaminants, leading to inefficiencies in sensitivity, cost, and time requirements, especially in clinical settings.

Innovation Solution

A method using antibody-modified or antigen-modified particles, filtered through a specific size-blocking filter, is applied in a sensor with two chambers connected by a pore, measuring ionic current changes to selectively detect and quantify proteins by analyzing pulse waveforms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional ELISA or chemiluminescence methods are used, then protein detection sensitivity is improved, but measurement procedure complexity and time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidmeasurement procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement procedure is segmented into distinct functional modules: sample preparation module, antibody-antigen binding module, and detection module. Each module performs a specific function independently, allowing parallel processing and reducing overall procedure complexity while maintaining sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Sample preparation and antibody-antigen complex formation are performed before the actual measurement step. This preliminary action allows the system to pre-process samples and pre-form complexes, reducing the complexity and time of the measurement procedure itself while maintaining detection sensitivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If repeated washing steps are performed to remove noise, then detection specificity is improved, but inspection time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection specificityVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Noise sources are extracted and removed from the measurement system through selective filtering of the sample and use of specific antibodies that bind only to target antigens. This extraction approach eliminates the need for repeated washing steps while maintaining detection specificity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Specific antibodies serve as intermediaries that selectively bind to target antigens, facilitating the separation of target signals from background noise. This intermediary approach enables specific detection without requiring extensive washing procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If pore electrical resistance method is used, then equipment cost is reduced, but noise separation from target signals becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment costVSAvoidnoise separation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Antibodies serve as intermediaries that specifically bind to target antigens, enabling the differentiation of target signals from background noise in the pore electrical resistance method. This intermediary approach maintains equipment simplicity while improving noise separation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement parameters are optimized by adjusting pore size, applied voltage, and antibody concentration to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio. These parameter changes enable effective noise separation using cost-effective equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-affected harmful factors

If filtration is performed to remove contaminants, then noise reduction is achieved, but target protein recovery may be lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidtarget protein recovery
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The filtration system uses locally optimized filter properties with specific pore sizes and charge characteristics that selectively retain contaminants while allowing target proteins to pass through. This local quality approach reduces noise while minimizing target protein loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Filtration parameters such as pore size, flow rate, and buffer composition are optimized to maximize target protein recovery while effectively removing contaminants. These parameter changes achieve noise reduction without significant loss of target proteins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables highly sensitive, inexpensive, and rapid protein detection and quantification in biological samples with reduced noise interference, even in the presence of contaminants.

Implementation Method 1

filtering the biological sample through a filter having a blocking size m

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 2

antibody-modified particles having a particle diameter d and an antibody that binds to the antigen attached to its surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAntigen-antibody binding:

Implementation Method 3

measuring a transient change in the ionic current that occurs each time the antibody-modified particle or the antigen-modified particle passes through the pore as a pulse waveform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical resistance measurement: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 4

the so-called pore electrical resistance method (Patent Literature 2) is used, in which nano-sized particles in an electrolyte are driven by electrophoresis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrophoresis: Electrophoresis

Data Source

PatentUS20250369961A1Method, Device and Program for Detecting and Quantifying Proteins
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 AIPORE INC
  • US20250369961A1 patent drawing
  • US20250369961A1 patent drawing
  • US20250369961A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for estimating presence or absence or a concentration of an antigen or an antibody to be detected in a biological sample collected from a living body, including the steps of:filtering the biological sample through a filter having a blocking size m to prepare a filtered sample;preparing a measurement target sample by mixing:antibody-modified particles having a particle diameter d and an antibody that binds to the antigen attached to its surface, or antigen-modified particles having a particle diameter d and an antigen that binds to the antibody attached to its surface,the filtered sample, anda first electrolyte solution;to a sensor having a structure in which two chambers separated by a partition wall having a pore with a pore diameter D communicate with each other through the pore, and an electrode is provided in each of the two chambers, filling one of the two chambers of the sensor with the measurement target sample;filling the other of the two chambers of the sensor with a second electrolyte solution to electrically connect the two chambers through the pores;applying a voltage between two electrodes in each of the two chambers to allow an ionic current to flow between the two electrodes via the pore, and measuring a transient change in the ionic current that occurs each time the antibody-modified particle or the antigen-modified particle passes through the pore as a pulse waveform group consisting of a plurality of pulse waveforms; andestimating the presence or absence or the concentration of the antigen or the antibody to be detected in the biological sample by analyzing the pulse waveform group;wherein the blocking size m is equal to or more than a lower limit determined according to a size of the antigen or the antibody to be detected and is equal to or less than ½ of the pore diameter D, andwherein the diameter d of the antibody-modified particle or the antigen-modified particle is ⅕ or more of the pore diameter D and less than the pore diameter D.