Protein Succination Detection for DMF Treatment Risk Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack an accurate way to monitor the impact of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) treatment on patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) to assess the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and lymphopenia, as existing guidelines are insufficient for determining when to discontinue treatment based on white blood cell counts.

Innovation Solution

Methods for determining the level of fumarate ester-derived protein modification, such as succination, in test samples, including hydrolyzing proteins or enzymatically digesting peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), followed by mass spectrometry to quantify modified cysteines, allowing comparison to control levels to adjust treatment programs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If white blood cell count monitoring is used to assess DMF treatment risk, then treatment safety can be monitored, but the monitoring is insufficient to accurately determine when to discontinue treatment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment safety monitoringVSAvoidaccuracy of treatment discontinuation determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from monitoring total white blood cell count to measuring the specific parameter of fumarate ester-derived protein modification levels. This parameter change enables more precise assessment of immune cell susceptibility to excessive modification, providing accurate guidance for treatment discontinuation decisions while maintaining treatment safety monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces protein modification levels as an intermediary marker that mediates between DMF treatment exposure and clinical outcomes. By measuring the intermediate biomarker (fumarate ester-derived protein modification) rather than directly measuring treatment efficacy or adverse events, the method provides early warning capability for treatment discontinuation decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If current white blood cell count guidelines are followed, then treatment can be continued, but the risk of PML and lymphopenia cannot be accurately assessed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment continuityVSAvoidrisk assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where protein modification levels are measured and used to adjust treatment decisions. The measured modification levels feed back into the treatment protocol, enabling dynamic adjustment of treatment continuity based on individual patient risk profiles, thus resolving the contradiction between maintaining treatment and ensuring safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary measurement of protein modification levels before making treatment discontinuation decisions. By assessing the degree of protein modification in advance, clinicians can predict future risk of PML and lymphopenia, enabling proactive treatment adjustment rather than reactive response to adverse events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If protein modification levels are measured to assess immune cell susceptibility, then treatment decisions can be optimized, but the measurement complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment accuracy of immune cell susceptibilityVSAvoidmeasurement procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the specific information needed (fumarate ester-derived protein modification levels) from the complex biological system. By focusing measurement on this specific modified protein marker rather than attempting to measure all possible immune cell parameters, the method achieves high assessment accuracy while keeping the measurement procedure manageable through targeted analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides a more accurate measure of immune cell susceptibility to excessive fumarate ester modification, enabling clinicians to modify or discontinue DMF treatment to prevent PML and lymphopenia, thereby improving patient safety and treatment efficacy.

Implementation Method 1

followed by mass spectrometry to quantify modified cysteines

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMass spectrometry:

Implementation Method 2

including hydrolyzing proteins or enzymatically digesting peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 3

enzymatically digesting peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnzymatic digestion: Enzyme

Data Source

PatentUS12535487B2Detection of fumarate-derived modification in a test sample
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
  • US12535487B2 patent drawing
  • US12535487B2 patent drawing
  • US12535487B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Examination of a test sample to determine the presence or quantity of succination of proteins is described. Examination can be via protein hydrolysis in total succination determination or via enzymatic digestion of isolated proteins and determination of the presence or quantity of modified peptides. The methods can be utilized for determination of excessive succination of lymph system proteins, which can be utilized in prevention or early detection of lymphopenia. Methods can be utilized for test samples of subjects under treatment with dimethyl fumarate suffering from multiple sclerosis. Methods can be utilized as a determination that treatment of the subject with DMF should be slowed or stopped.