Protocol Inspection for Electronic Account Resource Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies face challenges in identifying and accurately addressing event-based impacts across different electronic accounts and applications, leading to errors in resource allocation management, adverse client experiences, and increased compute and network resource usage.

Innovation Solution

The system detects events in a client electronic account using a threshold based on historical protocol performance, determines the impact on other accounts, and generates a data structure to adjust the protocols of affected accounts, thereby controlling the impact and improving resource allocation management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the system monitors all events across all applications to identify impacts, then the accuracy of impact identification is improved, but the computational resources and time required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact identification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the monitoring process by focusing only on events in the first application that are known to have protocol-level impacts. Instead of monitoring all events across all applications, the system identifies and processes only the relevant subset of events that trigger protocol adjustments, thereby reducing computational overhead while maintaining accurate impact identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary identification of impacted accounts before executing full protocol adjustments. By pre-determining which accounts are affected based on event type and protocol configuration, the system avoids unnecessary computational processing and resource allocation for accounts that would not be impacted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If the system manually identifies and addresses each impacted account, then the accuracy of resource allocation is improved, but the time required to respond to events increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation accuracyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback loops where events are automatically processed and protocol adjustments are executed without manual intervention. The system continuously monitors event outcomes and adjusts protocols in real-time, ensuring accurate resource allocation while minimizing response time through automated closed-loop control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically identifying impacted accounts and executing protocol adjustments without requiring manual intervention. The automated event processing system handles its own operations, from event detection to protocol modification, thereby maintaining high accuracy while reducing response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system implements comprehensive protocol monitoring across all applications, then the reliability of resource allocation control is improved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation control reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a universal event processing framework that handles multiple application protocols through a single unified mechanism. Instead of implementing separate monitoring and control systems for each application, the system employs a general-purpose protocol adjustment engine that can process events across all applications, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary event processing layer that sits between event sources and protocol implementations. This intermediary layer standardizes event handling and protocol adjustments, abstracting the complexity from individual applications while ensuring reliable resource allocation control through a centralized coordination mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250036476A1Protocol inspection for impact control on resource allocation in electronic accounts
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 ADP INC
  • US20250036476A1 patent drawing
  • US20250036476A1 patent drawing
  • US20250036476A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Protocol inspection for impact control on resource allocation in electronic accounts can include system that detects, based on historical performance of protocols to control resource allocation of applications, an event of a first account of a client on a first application. The system can determine that the event has an impact on resource allocation controlled by a protocol of a second electronic account on a second application. The system can generate, responsive to the detection, a data structure that includes data corresponding to the client and an instruction to cause an adjustment to the protocol. The system can transmit the data structure to the second application to control the impact via the adjustment to the protocol. The system can execute the protocol of the second electronic account to control resource allocation in accordance with the adjustment.