Proton Therapy Plan Optimization for Shorter Irradiation Time

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional proton therapy systems do not optimize treatment plans for delivery system machine-specific limitations, leading to inefficient irradiation times and increased probability of interlock occurrences, while existing systems focus primarily on dose volume constraints and plan robustness without considering temporal behavior.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that perform time-based optimization during treatment planning by accounting for beam characteristics and machine-specific parameters, such as beam energies, spot positions, and spot lateral spread, to create efficient and clinically acceptable treatment plans.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional proton therapy systems optimize treatment plans for dose volume constraints and plan robustness, then plan quality is improved, but irradiation time increases and system reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidirradiation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization engine modifies machine-specific parameters (beam energies, spot positions, spot lateral spread) to find optimal treatment delivery configurations that minimize irradiation time while maintaining plan quality constraints, directly resolving the contradiction between speed and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where the optimization engine continuously evaluates treatment plan results against machine capabilities and adjusts parameters iteratively to achieve optimal balance between irradiation time and system reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If treatment plans are optimized for dose volume constraints without considering machine-specific parameters, then plan quality is maintained, but interlock occurrences increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterlock occurrence rateVSAvoidtreatment delivery efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes machine-specific parameters (beam energies, spot positions, spot lateral spread) to ensure treatment plans are compatible with delivery system capabilities, reducing interlock occurrences while maintaining efficient treatment delivery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization engine performs preliminary optimization of treatment plans before delivery by accounting for machine-specific limitations, preventing interlock occurrences during actual treatment execution and ensuring smooth delivery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If beam parameters are optimized for shortest irradiation time, then treatment speed is improved, but plan quality may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveirradiation speedVSAvoidplan quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization engine systematically varies beam parameters (energies, spot positions, lateral spread) to identify the optimal configuration that achieves the shortest irradiation time while maintaining acceptable plan quality standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts beam parameters based on real-time optimization calculations, allowing flexible modification of treatment delivery parameters to balance speed and quality requirements for each specific treatment case

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces irradiation times, minimizes interlock occurrences, and improves system reliability by optimizing treatment plans for machine capabilities, allowing for shorter treatment delivery times and reduced patient discomfort.

Implementation Method 1

The protons in the beam are accelerated (via a generated electric field)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric field acceleration: Electric Field

Implementation Method 2

the beam of accelerated protons is subsequently 'extracted' and magnetically directed through a series of interconnecting tubes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field deflection: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

By superposition of several proton beams of different energies, a Bragg peak can be spread out to cover target volumes using a uniform, prescribed dose

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBragg peak: Bragg Diffraction

Data Source

PatentEP4212209B1Method and apparatus for performing irradiation time optimization for intensity modulated proton therapy during treatment planning while maintaining acceptable irradiation plan quality
Publication Date: 2026.03.18 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
  • EP4212209B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4212209B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4212209B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

A computer implemented method (800) of determining a treatment plan for a proton radiation therapy system, said method comprising: based on the proton radiation therapy system, accessing (804) machine configuration information including a plurality of machine parameters; iteratively adjusting (806) the plurality of machine parameters to generate one or more candidate treatment plans; simulate (808) the plurality of generated candidate treatment plans to determine a respective treatment time and respective plan quality associated with each of the treatment plans; select (810) a candidate treatment plan that yields an acceptable plan quality and a shortest possible treatment time.