Metal-Supported Protonic Ceramic Cells With Diffusion Barrier Co-Sintering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The development of metal-supported protonic ceramic electrochemical cells faces challenges with co-sintering ceramic layers on stainless steel, as it requires a reducing atmosphere to prevent oxidation, leading to decomposition, oxygen non-stoichiometry, and undesirable interdiffusion between layers, which affects the stability and conductivity of the proton conductors.

Innovation Solution

The use of specific proton-conducting ceramics like LCN, which are compatible with co-sintering on stainless steel, and the implementation of sintering aids like LiF and manganese oxide to reduce sintering temperatures and minimize silicon and chromium diffusion, along with the introduction of a barrier layer to prevent element migration, enhances the densification and stability of the ceramic layers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If co-sintering is performed in a reducing atmosphere to prevent oxidation of stainless steel, then oxidation resistance is improved, but decomposition and oxygen non-stoichiometry occur in proton-conducting ceramics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxidation resistanceVSAvoidoxygen stoichiometry
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

A barrier layer is applied to the stainless steel substrate before co-sintering to prevent oxidation of the metal and subsequent decomposition of the proton-conducting ceramic during the sintering process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A barrier layer acts as an intermediary between the stainless steel substrate and the proton-conducting ceramic, preventing direct interaction and element migration while allowing thermal contact during sintering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If co-sintering is performed at high temperatures to achieve proper densification, then densification is improved, but element migration and interdiffusion between layers increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedensificationVSAvoidelement migration
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A barrier layer is introduced as an intermediary between the metal substrate and ceramic layers to prevent element migration and interdiffusion during high-temperature co-sintering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

A composite structure consisting of a metal substrate, barrier layer, and proton-conducting ceramic is created to combine the advantages of both materials while mitigating their incompatibilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Stability of the object's composition

If conventional ceramic materials are used to maintain chemical stability, then stability is improved, but compatibility with metal support during co-sintering deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical stabilityVSAvoidco-sintering compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

A barrier layer serves as a mediator that enables the use of chemically stable conventional ceramic materials by preventing direct harmful interactions with the metal support during co-sintering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The device is segmented into distinct layers (metal substrate, barrier layer, proton-conducting ceramic) that can be optimized independently, allowing conventional ceramics to be used without direct contact with the metal

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for the successful fabrication of metal-supported cells with improved conductivity and reduced element migration, achieving densification at lower temperatures and maintaining the integrity of the proton-conducting phases, thus overcoming the limitations of existing co-sintering methods.

Implementation Method 1

the implementation of sintering aids like LiF and manganese oxide to reduce sintering temperatures and minimize silicon and chromium diffusion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid-phase sintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 2

the introduction of a barrier layer to prevent element migration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion barrier: Diffusion Barrier

Implementation Method 3

Proton-conducting oxide ceramics are widely explored as alternatives to conventional oxide conductors, primarily because the proton conductors display higher conductivity at intermediate temperatures (400-600° C.)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProton conduction: Fast Ion Conductor

Data Source

PatentUS12199326B2Fabrication processes for metal-supported proton conducting solid oxide electrochemical devices
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
  • US12199326B2 patent drawing
  • US12199326B2 patent drawing
  • US12199326B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure provides systems, methods, and apparatus related to metal-supported proton conducting solid oxide electrochemical devices. In one aspect, a method includes forming an electrode on a metal support of a device with a first proton-conducting ceramic. The metal support comprises an iron-chromium alloy. The first proton-conducting ceramic is in a powder form. An electrolyte layer is formed on the electrode and on the metal support of the device with a second proton-conducting ceramic. The second proton-conducting ceramic is in a powder form. The device is thermally treated at about 1200° C. to 1550° C.