Protection Provider Tokenization for Adaptive Cyber Resilience

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cybersecurity systems lack integrated incident response capabilities, operate in isolation, and fail to adapt to evolving threats, leading to delayed responses, fragmented visibility, and increased exposure to cyber threats due to static defenses.

Innovation Solution

A customized cybersecurity framework that models cyber resilience data using identities and metadata, integrating threat detection, response, and recovery, and facilitates connections with vendors for dynamic protection plans, utilizing tokenization and decentralized ledgers for enhanced data management and real-time monitoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If cybersecurity systems operate in isolation with static defenses, then system simplicity is maintained, but response capability and adaptability to evolving threats deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to evolving threatsVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments cybersecurity operations into distinct functional modules: threat detection, incident response, recovery, and vendor integration. Each module operates semi-independently through standardized interfaces, enabling adaptability to evolving threats while managing system complexity through modular architecture rather than monolithic integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The framework implements a universal control structure that handles multiple cybersecurity functions through a single integrated platform. The system can detect threats, execute response actions, manage recovery operations, and interface with various vendors through standardized protocols, providing multi-functionality that improves adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of time

If integrated incident response capabilities are implemented, then response time and coordination improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincident response timeVSAvoidintegration architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges threat detection, incident response, and recovery operations into a unified integrated system. By combining these previously separate functions under a single control structure with shared data and coordination mechanisms, the system reduces response time through improved coordination while managing complexity through functional consolidation rather than separate systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The framework incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor incident status, response effectiveness, and system state. This enables dynamic adjustment of response actions based on real-time conditions, reducing response time through adaptive decision-making while the feedback loops operate within the integrated architecture to manage complexity through automated coordination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If dynamic protection plans with vendor integration are added, then cybersecurity effectiveness improves, but device complexity and operational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecybersecurity protection effectivenessVSAvoidframework operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces standardized interfaces and protocols as intermediaries between the integrated cybersecurity system and external vendors. These intermediaries enable dynamic protection plans and vendor integration without requiring direct complex interactions between all system components, maintaining operational simplicity by abstracting the complexity of vendor integrations through standardized communication layers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250358120A1Systems and methods for protection provider tokenization
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 AS0001 INC
  • US20250358120A1 patent drawing
  • US20250358120A1 patent drawing
  • US20250358120A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer-readable media for modeling data using cyber resilience identities and associated metadata are disclosed. A system can include one or more processing circuits configured to generate at least one cyber resilience identity include at least a link or association with metadata corresponding with activity data performed by an entity or third-party or a third-party corresponding with at least one preference, protection, authentication, resilience, or security (PPARS) of a third-party. The one or more processing circuits can associate the at least one cyber resilience identity within a control structure, the control structure being compatible with at least one data structure corresponding with accessing at least a portion of the at least one cyber resilience identity. The one or more processing circuits can and transmit the at least one cyber resilience identity to at least one of (i) a distributed ledger, (ii) a data source, or (iii) an interface.