Provisioning Script Verification for VoIP Network Components

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In VoIP networks, improper connections and human errors during component installation are common, leading to inefficient and costly verification processes due to the complexity of these networks and the reliance on engineering guidelines.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that generates provisioning scripts for network components, compares them against configuration parameters, and generates alarms for discrepancies, ensuring correct installation and providing remedial notifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If deployment of additional human resources is used to verify correct installation of network components, then installation accuracy can be improved, but operational costs and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation accuracyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-verification through automated provisioning scripts that execute installation checks independently without human intervention. The scripts automatically compare actual installation state against expected configurations, allowing the system to verify its own installation correctness while reducing dependency on human resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual verification processes are replaced with automated electronic systems. Provisioning scripts using SNMP protocols and automated comparison algorithms substitute human technicians' manual checking, thereby maintaining installation accuracy while dramatically improving operational efficiency and reducing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If manual verification processes are used to check component installation, then installation errors can be detected, but the verification process becomes expensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Provisioning scripts are executed immediately upon component installation to perform real-time verification. Rather than waiting for manual inspection, the system proactively checks installation correctness at the moment of installation, ensuring errors are detected instantly without delaying deployment or requiring separate verification phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback loops where provisioning scripts continuously monitor and report on installation status. Comparison results are immediately fed back to identify discrepancies between actual and expected configurations, enabling rapid error detection and notification without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If engineers provide detailed specifications and guidelines, then installation correctness can be improved, but human errors during installation still occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation correctnessVSAvoiderror-free installation
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Provisioning scripts serve as an intermediary between engineering specifications and actual installation execution. The scripts automatically translate design requirements into verifiable checks, eliminating the need for human technicians to manually interpret and apply complex guidelines, thereby preventing human error while maintaining installation correctness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies of expected installation configurations from engineering specifications and uses these copies for automated comparison. By working with replicated configuration data rather than human interpretation, the system ensures consistent application of installation requirements without human error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS7532579B1Method and apparatus for assessing the installation of a component in a packet-switched network
Publication Date: 2009.05.12 AT&T CORP
  • US7532579B1 patent drawing
  • US7532579B1 patent drawing
  • US7532579B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for assessing the installation of a component in a packet-switched network is described. In one example, provisioning scripts for a particular network component are generated. A determination of whether the provisioning scripts match a set of configuration parameters associated with the provisioning scripts is then made. Lastly, an alarm is generated in the event the provisioning scripts do not match the set of configuration parameters.