Proximal Degas Microfluidic Actuation for Bubble-Free Pumping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current microfluidic technologies face challenges in achieving reliable, bubble-free, and portable fluid actuation for point-of-care testing and on-site environmental monitoring due to limitations in existing fluidic actuation methods, which often require external power, are prone to bubble formation, and lack controllability and reproducibility.

Innovation Solution

The Proximal Degas-driven Flow (PDF) method utilizes gas permeable materials like PDMS and TPX to create a pressure gradient between fluidic and degas channels, allowing air to diffuse out of the fluidic channel into the degas channel, reducing pressure and enabling bubble-free fluid actuation without external equipment, and can fill dead-end channels and chambers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If pressure-driven pumping is used to achieve controlled flow rates, then flow control is improved, but bubble formation and dead volumes increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rate controlVSAvoidbubble formation
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the gas phase from the fluidic channel by providing a separate degas channel that is in communication with the fluidic channel. This allows gas to be removed from the fluid path while maintaining pressure-driven flow control, thereby preventing bubble formation and dead volume issues without sacrificing flow rate control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the channel into distinct fluidic and degas channels that are spatially separated but functionally connected. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each channel's function - the fluidic channel maintains pressure control while the degas channel handles gas removal, resolving the contradiction between flow control and bubble prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Speed

If electrokinetic pumping is used to achieve precise flow control, then flow precision is improved, but device complexity and power requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow precisionVSAvoidpower supply requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the need for complex electrokinetic pumping by extracting the gas removal function into a separate degas channel that operates passively through pressure differential. This eliminates high voltage power supply requirements while maintaining precise flow control through simplified pressure-driven mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces electrokinetic (electrical) pumping with a mechanically simpler pressure-driven system combined with passive gas extraction. This substitution reduces device complexity and power requirements while achieving comparable or superior flow control through the degas channel mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If capillary-driven flow is used to achieve autonomous fluid actuation, then simplicity is improved, but controllability and reproducibility decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation simplicityVSAvoidflow controllability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the fluid actuation into two independent functions: capillary-driven autonomous fluid loading into the fluidic channel, and pressure-differential-driven gas removal through the degas channel. This segmentation allows capillary action to provide simple autonomous actuation while the separate degas channel provides controllable and reproducible flow by preventing bubble formation and enabling precise pressure control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the gas removal function from the capillary-driven fluid actuation by providing a separate degas channel. This allows the capillary system to maintain its simplicity and autonomous operation while the separate degas channel provides the controllable and reproducible flow conditions that capillary action alone cannot achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If proximal degas channels are used to remove gas from fluidic channels, then bubble-free flow is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebubble-free operationVSAvoidchannel network structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the gas removal function with the existing fluidic channel structure by providing a degas channel that is in direct communication with the fluidic channel through porous walls or openings. This integration allows bubble-free operation to be achieved without adding completely separate gas removal equipment, thereby improving reliability while minimizing the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method provides tunable, reproducible, and bubble-free microfluidic pumping, capable of handling biohazardous fluids, with average flow velocities ranging from 0.7 to 8 mm/s, and allows for the design of portable microfluidic platforms that do not require large or expensive pumping systems, enabling efficient point-of-care diagnostics.

Implementation Method 1

an air concentration gradient created across the two networks generates an in-situ diffusive flux out of the fluidic channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

resulting in a fluidic channel pressure reduction causing movement of the fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 3

Two channel networks, the fluidic channel and the degas channel, are located in close proximity to each other and an air concentration gradient created across the two networks generates an in-situ diffusive flux out of the fluidic channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPermeation: Permeation

Data Source

PatentUS9737888B2Proximal degas driven microfluidic actuation
Publication Date: 2017.08.22 RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
  • US9737888B2 patent drawing
  • US9737888B2 patent drawing
  • US9737888B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus with a self-contained, tunable, microfluidic pumping system that utilizes the high air permeability of the matrix material to actuate fluid flow in a network of fluidic microchannels and microstructures is provided. The pumping relies upon partial evacuation of degas/vacuum channels that are located next to the fluid channels to degas air from the fluid channels or structures producing a reduction of pressure in the fluidic channel leading to the flow of fluid from an inlet at atmospheric pressure through the device. The solution is isolated from the pumping apparatus since the liquid does not pass through the diffusion barriers. The apparatus and method can also provide bubble-free microfluidic pumping, without any auxiliary equipment or device pre-treatment, and can fill dead-end channels and chambers, providing a powerful liquid handling tool for a broad range of applications.