Proximity-Based Asset Exchange System Using Location Triggers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for electronic commerce and bartering lack mechanisms to evaluate items based on factors like importance to the seller, time-dependent events, relevance to potential buyers, and conditions affecting item value, and do not facilitate transactions using location-based or proximity-based information.

Innovation Solution

A system that enables the valuation and exchange of stored value assets and information using location-based and proximity-based triggers, employing cryptographic techniques for authenticity and traceability, and a server-based valuation engine to match assets for fair transactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If location-based and proximity-based triggering mechanisms are implemented, then transaction efficiency and relevance are improved, but system complexity and infrastructure requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs location-based services (LBS) and proximity detection systems as intermediaries to automatically trigger transaction workflows. These intermediaries bridge the gap between physical location and digital transaction initiation, enabling efficient asset exchange without manual intervention while managing system complexity through standardized communication protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring transaction parameters, asset metadata, and exchange rules before proximity events occur. This includes pre-registering assets with relevant attributes, setting up valuation criteria, and establishing exchange protocols in advance, so that when proximity triggering occurs, the transaction can execute immediately with minimal processing overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If cryptographic verification and traceability mechanisms are implemented, then transaction security and authenticity are improved, but processing time and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Cryptographic signatures, verification keys, and asset authenticity markers are generated and attached to assets during their initial registration and creation phases. This preliminary cryptographic preparation ensures that when transactions occur, verification can proceed rapidly using pre-computed hash values and digital signatures, minimizing processing time during actual exchange while maintaining strong security guarantees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive asset valuation considering multiple factors is implemented, then transaction fairness is improved, but computational complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveasset valuation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valuation system dynamically adjusts and prioritizes different asset parameters based on the specific transaction context, asset type, and market conditions. Rather than uniformly processing all possible valuation factors, the system selectively applies relevant parameters (such as location, time, asset category, and market demand) to compute fair value, reducing computational complexity while maintaining precision where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If proximity-based automatic triggering is implemented, then user convenience and transaction speed are improved, but risk of unauthorized or erroneous transactions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidtransaction authorization reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where proximity-triggered transactions are monitored, logged, and verified against predefined authorization rules. User preferences, authorization levels, and transaction histories are fed back into the system to refine future triggering decisions, ensuring that automatic transactions remain convenient while maintaining reliability through continuous learning and adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250005624A1Proximity detection, virtual detection, or location based triggering of the exchange of value and information
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 PROCTOR CONSULTING LLC
  • US20250005624A1 patent drawing
  • US20250005624A1 patent drawing
  • US20250005624A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, methods, and apparatuses are provided for valuation and exchange of stored value assets, information of value, and the transfer of value to or among individuals. The exchanged assets may be of a similar nature, e.g., music files exchanged for other music files, and exchange or trade of information such as rewards value or a restaurant coupon. The exchanged assets may also be other dissimilar assets exchanged between individuals and/or entities. The exchange may be initiated in numerous ways such as after completing a review, exchanging or trading a gift card, a prepaid card, a reward card, a coupon, a ticket, a pass, and/or the like when in proximity to a specific location or a location of some type or category, and/or exchanging or trading of other assets between individuals based on one or more constraints such as time, location, need, desire for the assets, and/or proximity.