Proximity-Based Entity Tracking Using Beacon-Scanner Spatial Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for tracking inventory, input costs, and machine usage in agricultural settings are inefficient and manual, lacking electronic integration and automation, making it difficult to accurately allocate resources and costs across specific areas of a farm.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing communication devices such as beacons and scanners to establish spatial relationships between entities, define geo-fenced areas, and track location-based characteristics, allowing for automated data collection and reporting of operations and resource usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual tracking methods are used for inventory and machine usage, then implementation is simple, but tracking precision and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs universal communication devices (beacons and scanners) that can track multiple types of entities (livestock, equipment, inventory) using the same technological platform. This multi-functional approach enables precise tracking across diverse farm operations without requiring separate specialized systems for each tracking need, thereby improving measurement precision while controlling system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces communication devices as intermediary elements between entities to be tracked and the central system. Beacons attached to entities emit signals that are received by scanners, acting as intermediaries that enable precise location and usage tracking without requiring direct complex integration between all system components, thus improving tracking precision while managing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If manual tracking methods are used, then system complexity is low, but productivity and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tracking system operates autonomously through self-service mechanisms where beacons automatically emit identification signals and scanners automatically detect and record data without human intervention. This automation eliminates manual tracking efforts, dramatically improving productivity and tracking efficiency while the standardized self-service protocol keeps system complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables continuous tracking of entities as they move through different locations and operations. Beacons continuously emit signals and scanners continuously monitor for these signals, ensuring uninterrupted data collection. This continuous operation maximizes productivity by providing real-time visibility into resource allocation and machine usage without requiring periodic manual interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If automated proximity-based tracking is implemented, then tracking precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial relationship detection accuracyVSAvoidcommunication device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tracking system is segmented into independent, simple functional components: beacons that only emit signals and scanners that only receive and process signals. This segmentation allows each component to remain technologically simple while achieving precise spatial relationship detection through their coordinated interaction, thereby improving measurement precision without significantly increasing individual device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11716588B2System and method for proximity-based analysis of multiple agricultural entities
Publication Date: 2023.08.01 REALMFIVE INC
  • US11716588B2 patent drawing
  • US11716588B2 patent drawing
  • US11716588B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for proximity-based analysis of multiple entities includes a first communication device associated with a first entity and an additional communication device associated with an additional entity, wherein the first communication device and the additional communication device are communicatively couplable. The system includes one or more processors communicatively coupled to at least one of the first communication device or the at least an additional communication device. The one or more processors are configured to: identify a spatial relationship between the first entity and the additional entity based on one or more signals from the first communication device or the additional communication device, identify an operation unit defined by an association between the first entity and the additional entity based on the spatial relationship between the first entity and the at least the additional entity, and report one or more characteristics of the operation unit.